WHAT ARE FARAGE'S RED FLAGS?

by Daniel Barge

A conventional and rather time-worn critique of British politics is that the two main parties are just two cheeks of the same arse. This is meant to get you thinking about third party options, by which is seldom meant the "official third Party" the Liberal Democrats. No, the two cheeks meme is there to get you thinking about radical alternatives to the "uniparty" status quo, parties like the BNP in the old days and Reform UK more recently. 

But is Reform UK really an alternative to the the arse that is British politics or is it perhaps something even worse?

Our belief here at Neocrat is that any political vehicle Nigel Farage is associated with should be treated with the utmost suspicion. This is based upon several red flags that strongly suggest Farage is at least a fellow traveller of the Kremlin. The Kremlin, by the way, in case anybody doesn't know by now, is essentially a morally vacuous gangster state whose only interest in the West is how to weaken and destabilise it, often by playing upon our inherent flaws and weaknesses of which there are great many. Playing upon our weaknesses for geopolitical gain is never to be confused with "offering solutions," which is how a great many useful idiots view this Kremlin input.

So, back to Farage, what are the main red flags that point to him being aligned with this malign influence?

(1) LETTING IN "SYRIAN REFUGEES"

It has probably been forgotten by almost everybody, but back in 2013, Nigel Farage, the supposed opponent of Muslim immigration and Islamism was actually calling for the UK government to admit millions of jihadi Muslims from Syria. A Guardian article at the time reported:

"Nigel Farage is calling on the government to start admitting refugees fleeing the fighting in Syria into Britain.

The Ukip leader, who has been at the forefront of the opposition to allowing migrants from Bulgaria and Romania unfettered access to the UK, said the position of those displaced by conflict was very different.

'I think refugees are a very different thing to economic migration and I think that this country should honour the spirit of the 1951 declaration on refugee status that was agreed,' he told BBC News. 'It was agreed with the UN and even through the European court, which sadly has changed its role. But the original ideas of defining what a refugee is were good ones. I think actually there is a responsibility on all of us in the free west to try and help some of those people in Syria fleeing literally in fear of their lives.'

Even a lot of idiots in the Dissident Right who hang on Farage's every word seem to be ignorant of this extremely odd statement. What could possibly explain it? It simply doesn't make sense unless viewed from the viewpoint of someone working for the Kremlin.

At the time Putin's ally President Assad of Syria was in danger of being overthrown by a post-Arab Spring civil war and the prospect of "humanitarian" western intervention. One way to ensure Assad's survival would be to take the pressure off by allowing Syrian Muslims fighters and their families to escape to the West, something that would have deflated the opposition forces. In fact a similar effect was achieved the next year in 2014 when German Chancellor Angel Merkel allowed a flood of Syrian migrants from the jihadi part of the county to flood into Europe.

The sort of move advocated and then enacted by Merkel would also have the additional benefit of creating a a situation in Western countries leading to further destabilisation -- a definite win-win for the Kremlin!

(2) HIS MANY APPEARANCES ON RUSSIA TODAY AND MEETING(S) WITH THE RUSSIAN AMBASSADOR

Someone somewhere must have data on the number of appearances by Farage on Kremlin propaganda channel Russia Today, but it was certainly in the dozens if not hundreds, and Farage was paid a considerable but still unclear amount of money for this.

In 2013 Farage also met the Russian ambassador, Alexander Yakovenko, who we know was part of Kremlin ops to disrupt the West. Farage later made a habit of denying this ever happened despite Photographic evidence.

In June 2018 he claimed “I’ve never met the Russian Ambassador.” Did he mean that he had actually met Yakovenko in his "non-diplomatic" role as Kremlin spy master, and, if so, why?  

Farage meeting the Russian "ambassador" at the Russian "embassy" 

(3) FARAGE'S "BAG MAN" AARON BANKS WAS IN AND OUT OF THE RUSSIAN EMBASSY

In 2015, FSB agent and former KGB agent Alexander Udod invited Aaron Banks, then UKIP’s biggest backer, to meet Russian Ambassador Yakovenko at his London residence. Cosy!

Udod was later expelled, along with 23 other Russian officials, after the Skripal Novichok poisonings. Court documents tell us that  Banks went on to meet Ambassador (or Kremlin spy-in-chief) Yakovenko on many other occasions, during which they reportedly discussed deals involving the privatisation of Russian gold and diamond state companies, and probably much else. 

Banks was the key "bag man" for Farage, donating £8 million to Farage’s "Leave EU" campaign, while also directly funding Farage with a £4.4 million rented home, a luxury car, a bodyguard, a private office, and trips to the United States. And that's just the stuff that's out in the open. 

Aaron Banks, dodgy looking little cunt

(4) FARAGE WAS PART OF THE "INNER CIRCLE" OF THE KREMLIN HACK JOB ON HILLARY CLINTON

The main details of the Russian hacking of the emails of John Podesta, chair of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, are profuse, complex, but also rather well established. Less well known is how Farage had a ringside seat at the whole thing. 

As reported by the Guardian, sometime between the 18th and 21st of July, 2016, around the time of the Republican National Convention in Cleveland that nominated Trump as the GOP candidate, Farage had a secret dinner with Roger Stone and the Infowars host Alex Jones.

Stone was playing a key role at the time in liaising between Trump and the Russians and Julian Assange, whose Wikileaks site was also a key component of the Kremlin's "October surprise" to disrupt Clinton's campaign.

At the time Assange was holed up in the Ecuadorian embassy in London, and difficult to reach. A federal indictment against Stone records:

“On or about October 3, 2016, Stone wrote to a supporter involved with the Trump Campaign, ‘spoke to my friend in London last night. The payload is still coming.’” 

It seems likely that Farage was the link man, paying unexplained visits to the  Ecuadorian Embassy. 

Farage exiting the Ecuadorian embassy after visiting Julian Assange.

It is rather odd that "British nationalist" Nigel Farage would be visiting the Ecuadorian embassy merely to console and show support for someone who was earlier also instrumental in doxxing the personal details of thousands of British nationalists, something else that is today routinely forgotten.
 

(5) HE HAS HIS OWN SHOW ON RUSSIA TODAY 2.0

Central to the relative success of Nigel Farage's Reform UK insurgency is the GB News channel, which has enabled him to maintain his media profile since Russia Today was banned from the airwaves.

GB News is effectively Russia Today 2.0, playing similar points to a similar audience, seeking to polarise and disrupt the British infospace and political arena. Here at Neokrat we have already drawn attention to the dubious "dark money" funding of this highly suspicious channel, which comes from a former business associate of Vladimir Putin, who is based in the "dark money" capital of Dubai.

This channel, which loses around £30 million a year, is essentially an expendable asset that will be burnt through in the next few months in the attempt to support Farage's insurgency, disrupt the Conservative Party, and this indirectly support the Kremlin's attempt kill and enslave millions of our fellow Europeans for its morally vacuous gangster economy.