FAKE NEWS: GLASGOW AIRPORT EVACUATED FOR SIX HOURS OVER "INNOCENT ITEM"

Thousands evacuated to a multistorey car park in freezing conditions

Something extremely suspicious occurred at the UK's Glasgow Airport yesterday. 

At 5:55 am a suspicious package was detected within the airport's luggage processing area. This led to the entire airport being shut down for six hours and chaotic queues for the rest of the day. During the incident, thousands of passengers, many of them dressed for sunnier climes, were shunted out into a carpark where they remained shivering for at least four hours. Thermo-foil "blankets" were handed out to some of them. A Salvation Army tea-truck arrived to hand out a limited number of hot drinks.

More significantly a top-level Royal Navy Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) team, probably based at the Royal Navy nuclear submarine base at Faslane, was called in to deal with the situation. At one stage a bomb disposal robot was deployed. However, after half a day of panic, the EOD team departed, and the public were blithely informed that nothing had been found. In fact, the story was that it was just an "innocent item" found in a passenger's luggage. Likely story!

While it is tempting to think that this is just another pathetic example of how feminised and hysterical our society has become -- one in which harm avoidance is worshipped to the point where it causes real harm as with the Covid lockdown -- this is simply not how the World works. There is much here that is unexplained, but not inexplicable. 

It is much more likely that what happened at Glasgow was in fact deadly serious and that the British government has decided to blatantly lie to people, possibly for good reasons, possibly for bad. 

Consider three equivalent stories:

In July this year there was a bomb scare at Glasgow Airport after a 23-year-old man claimed there was a bomb in a rucksack that he had left at the airport. But instead of shutting down and evacuating the entire airport, only a small part of the airport was cleared, and things were soon returned to normal with no flights cancelled. 

Two months ago, there was an incident at East Midlands Airport in England, "after a passenger brought an item through security that was a cause for concern." This led to the evacuation of the small airport, but this only lasted around an hour, from just before 7pm up until just after 8pm. 

Last year Manchester Airport also saw a bomb scare, when a 'suspicious package' was found in hand luggage. Was the entire airport evacuated with thousands made to stand in the freezing cold for 4 to 5 hours? No, most of the airport continued to work.

As reported by the Manchester Evening News:

The ‘suspicious package’ at Manchester Airport which sparked a major police operation and shut down a terminal is understood to have been a collection of wires, cans and an electronic device.

The eight-hour incident, which led to the partial evacuation of the hub's Terminal Two, was later found to have presented 'no threat to security', with the package confirmed by police as 'not being a viable device'.

Officers, firefighters and explosive experts attended Terminal Two on Tuesday night while the Counter Terrorism Unit were ‘made aware’, after the alarm was raised by the hub’s security staff.

It’s understood the package had been discovered in a passenger’s hand luggage as they passed through security and an anomaly was picked up during the scanning process.

During the incident, which started at around 3.20pm, passengers and staff were evacuated from the hub’s new Terminal Two, which was opened in July.

Terminals One and Three - which are at the other side of the airport complex - continued to operate as normal.

The difference with Glasgow yesterday is marked and obvious. All terminals in Glasgow were evacuated, even though this involved throwing people out into the carpark in freezing temperatures.

Also, the report on the Manchester bomb scare describes a device that at least looks like a bomb, while the Glasgow incident does not even tell us what the perfectly "innocent item" was.

There is more. While the story was happening, there were complaints all over social media that major news organisations were avoiding the story or downplaying it.

On the BBC, the story was pushed down the news agenda as fast as possible and is difficult to find now. Sky News failed to report the story at all. In Scotland, due to the peculiarities of its petty nationalist politics, this was framed as more proof of the disrespect for Scottish issues. This kind of narrative is certainly convenient for those hiding the story, as that clearly couldn't be the real reason for demoting the story or the even bigger story that the actual demotion of such stories would be. 

So, what can we infer from the known facts and the apparent cover-up?

Firstly, it is still not clear from the limited reporting whether the "luggage" with the supposed "innocent item" was departing or arriving. Either is therefore a possibility.

Secondly, it is clear that no airport would be shut down for half a day if the "innocent item" was in fact an innocent item. From this we can conclude that what was found and removed was in fact highly dangerous.

Thirdly, given that the "innocent item" was probably dangerous, and this fact is being kept from the public, we can infer that there is an "interstate" nature to the incident that took place at Glasgow Airport. To be precise, some kind of state act of terrorism, possibly involving a chemical, biological, or even a dirty nuclear weapon was involved.

Revealing the full nature of such an incident to the public, would have serious political and diplomatic repercussions that could lead to war. It is at least understandable why any government would prefer to deal with such an issue outside the glare of media publicity.

Fourthly, if it is indeed an act of state terrorism that was prevented at Glasgow Airport yesterday, it may become apparent in the subsequent acts of the British government. This could involve "diplomatic expulsions" or other acts.

This leaves the question of which states would be capable of attempting such an atrocity at Glasgow.

I believe a list of possible suspect nations would include the following:

Russia: due to British support for the Ukraine, which has led to the deaths of tens of thousands of Russians.

Iran: due to possible revenge motives for British secret service involvement in attacks on Iranian personnel.

Israel: possibly as a false flag attack meant to strengthen Western support for Israel or precipitate further Western involvement in the Middle East.

China or North Korea for unknown reasons.

Furthermore, there is also the possibility that the incident involved someone trying to smuggle something highly deadly out of the country, as the UK is a centre of research on deadly chemicals, toxins, and biological agents.