TAYLOR: "CALLING SOMEONE 'RACIST' TURNS THEM GAY"

Despite being called a "racist" millions of times over, Jared is still not even remotely gay.

by Colin Liddell

Jared Taylor is like the hammer. Everything he sees looks like a nail. This comes across in his recent video "Do You Have to Be Insane to Be a Liberal?" which looks at the rise in LGBTQ identification among young people. 

What could possibly be behind this massive trend? Well, we are talking about Jared Taylor here, so no points for guessing the answer Jared has at hand. Yes, it is the oppression of what I refer to as "Poor Wittle White People," y'know the eternal victims of the entire rest of humanity.

To prove his nail-shaped points, Taylor quickly jumps to a few passages in an article in City Journal by someone called Leor Sapir that "explains" something called Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria (ROGD):

Their schools compulsively tell their children how awful it is to be white, how white people enjoy unearned “privilege,” how they benefit from “systems” put in place by and for white people for the sole purpose of oppressing “people of color.” Plagued by guilt, the children—almost all of them girls—rush to the sanctuary of “LGBTQ+” identity. Once there, they are catapulted into hero status. According to Patricia, some teachers at her daughter’s school are more forgiving toward “queer” and “trans” kids who hand in their homework late.

The students, especially the girls, absorb this messaging. They are acutely sensitive to how identity affects their social status and academic fortunes. They want the warmth that comes with queer/trans identity, but above all they don’t want to be thought of as vicious oppressors. Lacking maturity and self-confidence, they fail to put “anti-racist” indoctrination in its proper context. They do not appreciate its ahistorical, anti-intellectual, and anti-humanist foundations, nor are they aware of the incentives leading teachers and administrators to foist it on them. Being white is not something these teenagers can escape, but they can mitigate its social costs by declaring themselves part of an oppressed group.

Yes, calling White people "racist" turns them gay! Apparently.

Even the article pushing this rather offbeat theory then mentions that that is only half the story, but for Taylor it is the whole story. He has heard all he needs to hear and will now hear no more. The hammer, after all, only sees nail.

Once Mr Taylor has left the room, the article goes on to state that becoming openly LGBTQ is also seen as a convenient way for young people, especially young White women, to escape the bourgeois expectations that identifying as "female" places upon them. In other words, it's a freedom move.

The weak point of Sapir's article of course is that it fails to carry any photos or personal details of the ROGD cases mentioned or referred to. My guess is that these are "young ladies" who are universally fat, dumpy, geeky, or deeply unattractive in some other way, and therefore in mortal terror of rejection. I believe that is a big thing when you're in your teens and twenties.

The real story behind the massive rise in genuine LGBTQ people and those who identify as such is the inverse of the so-called Sexual Revolution.

The Sexual Revolution I am referring to here, by the way, is the one that affected relations between heterosexual men and women, not the Gay Liberation struggle, which was a separate thing that developed in its wake.

As stated elsewhere, this Sexual Revolution broke down the monogamous and indeed more egalitarian distribution of sexual partners, by which even geeky guys and mousy girls could be almost certain to acquire a sexual and life partner.

This system, built on the brittle morality of some 3000-year-old Middle Eastern fairy tales, was ready to collapse by the mid-20th century, and the 1960s dealt it a death blow. What replaced it was the Neo-Liberal free market in sex. This meant that alphas, like me, got unbelievable amounts of pussy, much of it top notch, while the beta male masses got almost nothing, the poor bastards!

Of course, less attractive women could still get shagged, but then again, getting pumped and dumped was not what they wanted, and it left horrendous psychic scars.

Of course, in theory, there was nothing here to stop less attractive people getting together with less attractive people of the opposite sex and forming steady relationships. Indeed, a great many still manage to do so. But, accompanying the break down in general monogamy, was also a toxic rise in sexual expectations, pushed by our over-sexed culture.

The standard expectations of everyone in the highly unequal sexual pyramid became the same as those held by the alpha males and females at the top of the pyramid.

Ugly girls wanted alpha guys, although such alphas' only interest in them was in brutal pumping and dumping. Likewise, the growing number of incel men were thrown into pornography, which increasingly came to define their sexual expectations, meaning that even where they had a chance of getting a dowdy girlfriend, they were less likely to make that work. 

One of the key characteristics of sexuality is that it is highly flexible and polymorphous. This is true for everybody -- see how men behave in prison and Muslim societies -- but especially true for young people, and more true for women than men.

The recent generations that are reported to identify heavily as LGBTQ are the first generations to exist fully in the shadow of the Sexual Revolution. Many of them, especially those set up to fail under the new system, have essentially intuited that conventional sexual identity is an unwinnable game for them. The result of this is that they have made the subtle psychological adjustments necessary to save their fragile egos. In many cases this means becoming or identifying as LGBTQ. A gay beta, after all, gets as much if not more sex than a heterosexual alpha. While identifying as "lesbian" becomes a face saving way of being left on the shelf or not even pumped and dumped. 

This is of course a highly complex and multifaceted phenomenon that a short article like this can only do partial justice to, but Taylor's attempt to shoehorn this modern-day phenomenon into his simplistic racial analysis gives you an excellent example of just why the Alt-Right failed; namely it's overreliance on crude, emotionally driven, and predetermined "analysis."

___________________________________

Colin Liddell is the Chief Editor of Neokrat and the author of Interviews & Obituaries, a collection of encounters with the dead and the famous. Support his work by buying it here (USA), here (UK), and here (Australia).