Destabilised Britain: one boring man with glasses replaced by another
So, that was Keir Starmer. There is a lot that could be said about his political passing. Something along the lines that he wasn't so bad but everybody seemed to hate him anyway.
He was getting a grip on the Boriswave levels of immigration that he had inherited and also dealing reasonably effectively with the mad orange baboon in the White House (no, Donald, you can't use our military bases to bomb Iranian schoolgirls!)
But, looking at things Big Picture (which is where I generally pitch my tent), the real relevance of Sir Keir and his short, two-year career is how it reveals the usually hidden Xenocratic nature of Britain (and actually quite a lot of other Western democracies). For those who don't know, "Xenocratic" means a government controlled by foreigners.
Firstly, let's be clear, Sir Keir only got here because somebody dropped £5 million pounds into Nigel Farage's pocket to run in the 2024 general election. Boosted by his own TV channel (K)GB News at a price tag of £30 million a year in dark money and all the shills and useful idiots on social media weaponizing boomer stupidity, Farage, as could be predicted by anyone with half a brain, merely did enough to split the right-wing vote, push the Tories down, and allow an unpopular Labour Party to sweep the country in a "pseudo-landslide" that was more a by-product of our deeply unrepresentative first-past-the-post electoral system.
Yes, the 2024 UK general election was a classic destabilisation op that, like Donald Trump's insurgent run in the 2016 US Presidential election, probably did way better than expected—and all the red flags point to the Kremlin.
But, looking at things Big Picture (which is where I generally pitch my tent), the real relevance of Sir Keir and his short, two-year career is how it reveals the usually hidden Xenocratic nature of Britain (and actually quite a lot of other Western democracies). For those who don't know, "Xenocratic" means a government controlled by foreigners.
Firstly, let's be clear, Sir Keir only got here because somebody dropped £5 million pounds into Nigel Farage's pocket to run in the 2024 general election. Boosted by his own TV channel (K)GB News at a price tag of £30 million a year in dark money and all the shills and useful idiots on social media weaponizing boomer stupidity, Farage, as could be predicted by anyone with half a brain, merely did enough to split the right-wing vote, push the Tories down, and allow an unpopular Labour Party to sweep the country in a "pseudo-landslide" that was more a by-product of our deeply unrepresentative first-past-the-post electoral system.
Yes, the 2024 UK general election was a classic destabilisation op that, like Donald Trump's insurgent run in the 2016 US Presidential election, probably did way better than expected—and all the red flags point to the Kremlin.
Before there was GB News there was Russia Today.
But why would the Kremlin want to boost the Labour Party? Simple, because they know that Labour activists and MPs fall for the pro-pacifist bullshit that allows them more of a free hand—"Why are we spending billions to keep a pointless war going in the Ukraine when we could be spending it all on free biscuits for pensioners?" etc., etc. But also because political churn in geopolitical opponents is always good in the Kremlin's playbook.
Now, let's look at the other side of the Xenocratic coin. Why did Sir Keir become leader in the first place, and why was he ultimately turfed out? Here our story takes us to another foreign capital, Tel Aviv, and the highly dubious role it has been playing in the politics of their "friends & allies" for a very long time.
Sir Keir was "assisted" to became Labour Party leader in 2020 as part of an op to undermine and kick out Jeremy Corbyn, a friend of the Palestinian people. Of course, it wasn't just Zionists and Mossad types who were glad to get rid of him. Vested interests in the UK security establishment were also on board, which meant that the media was fully on board, pushing all the crap about Corbyn being an "anti-Semite." Starmer, with his nice Jewish wife, by contrast, was their boy.
But it was also Israel that damned Starmer. During the horrific genocidal war against Gaza and other terroristic actions by Israel, not least of which was the attempt to turn Iran into an anarchic bloodbath, Sir Keir sailed too close to the Zionist wind, totally alienating him from much of the grassroots left and the rank and file of his own party. Even in his goodbye speech he made sure to hype "ripping out the poison of Anti-Semitism" as his proudest achievement.
It was this that boosted the rise of the so-called Green Party, a sinister "alt-Left" group that is routinely boosted by the Kremlin's network. Here's American Green Party leader Jill Stein having a cosy meal with Vlad that was doing the rounds recently:
It was Starmer's lock-step with the Zionists, which included branding "ma & pa" protest groups like Palestinian Action as "terrorists," that eclipsed Starmer's modest technocratic successes for left-wing voters. This ultimately is what planted the political dagger between his shoulder blades and gave it the Andy Burnham twist.
The evidence is now clear, Britain is not a sovereign democracy. Its political system, along with its inherently unstable first-past-the-post electoral model, is just a means for foreign manipulation. It is instead a Xenocracy, constantly blown off course by foreign winds and unable to serve the true interests of its people.
And, rest assured, there will already be several plans in several foreign nations—Russia, Israel, Chine, Big Tech, etc.—aimed at throwing the next British government into chaos. The former Mayor of Manchester has no idea what is about to hit him.
Two tears Keir "ripped out the poison of Anti-Semitism"
___________________________________
Colin Liddell is the Chief Editor of Neokrat and the author of Interviews & Obituaries, a collection of encounters with the dead and the famous. Support his work by buying his book here (USA), here (UK), and here (Australia), or by taking out a paid subscription on his Substack.
No comments:
Post a Comment
All Comments MUST include a name (either real or sock). Also don't give us an easy excuse to ignore your brilliant comment by using "shitposty" language.