Following an almost successful attempt by a Sudanese refugee to behead a White man in the street (see above), it's kicking off in Belfast. Gangs of men dressed in Black are taking to the streets to show their anger. Stuff has been set on fire.
A number of things need to be mentioned here. The UK government has been struggling for some time to make their "refugee settlement plan" palatable to the general public. They have done this by (a) dispersing refugees across the country and (b) stopping them living together in large groups in the remote towns and cities to which they have been dispersed.
The government seems to have come to the conclusion that as long as they prevent these groups of mainly brown, male, and Islamic refugees lumping together in ghettos or congregating in so-called "refugee hotels," then the problem will disappear, or at least the public will stop noticing.
The government seems to have come to the conclusion that as long as they prevent these groups of mainly brown, male, and Islamic refugees lumping together in ghettos or congregating in so-called "refugee hotels," then the problem will disappear, or at least the public will stop noticing.
They have been wrong on both counts, mainly because the refugees have not been cooperating. Yes, I know -- the ungrateful bastards!
In fact, dispersal is absolutely guaranteed to make things worse in certain ways. On the plus side, it makes it harder for refugees to form highly visible ethnic enclaves and then ethnic gangs, but on the negative side it worsens the mental health prospects of each individual refugee. This is because the so-called ethnic gangs and ghetto concentrations, in addition to being a threat to the wider society and a political eyesore for politicians, are also the refugees' own mental health networks. Without these, expect a massive upsurge in alienation levels, insanity, and random acts of brutal violence.
What we are really dealing with here is what I call "the Refugee Paradox," which is this: There are two kinds of refugees -- fake ones and genuine ones. Given a choice, you should probably opt for the former. This is because a genuine refugee is someone who has suffered great mental torment and stress. Many of them have been tortured or raped; or they have seen their families massacred, etc., etc. -- all sorts of mad shit has happened to them that isn't ever going to be forgotten. At least with the fake ones, you are dealing with people who have not been pushed over the edge.
There you have it in a nutshell. Refugees are either fake, in which case they should be kicked out for dishonesty and for breaking immigration laws, or they are genuine, in which case they are too mentally damaged and have too many demons to easily fit into UK society.
Indeed, in recent days we see that even non-British people born in the UK have the greatest difficulty adjusting to British society; and I would even go so far as to say that it is even difficult for sane British people these days. Assimilating to a society, even one you're born into and in which your ethnic group is the majority, is an uphill struggle, so we are practically insane to think that deeply traumatised brown people from war-torn countries are going to easily "settle down." Even more so when they have been placed under additional stress by the UK's own "under the radar" and "under the carpet" dispersal strategy, something that separates genuine refugees from their only realistic stabilising force in the UK, namely their own ethnic community.
Indeed, in recent days we see that even non-British people born in the UK have the greatest difficulty adjusting to British society; and I would even go so far as to say that it is even difficult for sane British people these days. Assimilating to a society, even one you're born into and in which your ethnic group is the majority, is an uphill struggle, so we are practically insane to think that deeply traumatised brown people from war-torn countries are going to easily "settle down." Even more so when they have been placed under additional stress by the UK's own "under the radar" and "under the carpet" dispersal strategy, something that separates genuine refugees from their only realistic stabilising force in the UK, namely their own ethnic community.
The only credible way to have a refugee policy in the 21st century is to either limit it to just women and young children, or else to allow refugee communities to naturally form. As these invariably lead to other problems, like gangs and crime, these communities, which would effectively be ghettoes, must be placed under strict control and have their own well-guarded walls or wires in order to prevent harm to the general population. Anything else is just a politician moving his lips.
___________________________________
Colin Liddell is the Chief Editor of Neokrat and the author of Interviews & Obituaries, a collection of encounters with the dead and the famous. Support his work by buying his book here (USA), here (UK), and here (Australia), or by taking out a paid subscription on his Substack.
No comments:
Post a Comment
All Comments MUST include a name (either real or sock). Also don't give us an easy excuse to ignore your brilliant comment by using "shitposty" language.