Apparently there is a strong theological basis for the tolerance of pedophile tendencies that has recently been exposed in the "America First" and Christian Nationalist movement by the Milo Yiannopoulos and Ali Alexander scandals.
This was underscored by "top Catholic theologian" Nicholas J. Fuentes who pointed out on a recent "live sermon" that the Virgin Mary was definitely underage when impregnated by God's holy semen.
Fuentes, aged 24, opined:
Fuentes, aged 24, opined:
When the Holy Spirit selected Mary, did the Holy Spirit go, "Mmm, let's look for a mature woman that I have something in common"? Did a Person of the Trinity go around and say, "Mmmm I need to find one of those mature women that is smart and has common interests, and things in common with me"? Or did the Holy Spirit go and say, "I need a..." How old was the Virgin Mary? I think she was like... Well she wasn't eighteen, I'll say that much. Certainly wasn't eighteen..."
Fuentes then talked about how he and God liked to splash around in the "shallow end of the pool." This is believed to be a technical theological term for underage sex.
Fuentes, who has a deep faith and profound understanding of Catholic dogma, has never actually been in a Catholic Church, due to fears that he may be mistaken for a small boy and get sexually molested -- or worse -- by a passing priest.
Fuentes himself is certainly in the shallow end of the CIA (or whatever state agency he works for) pool! Clearly in the juvenile outreach and misdirection department.
ReplyDeleteAnd the way he speaks! I think it safe to say that the blessed Theotokos would herself scrub his mouth with acidic toiletcleaner if she heard him.
All this aside, I cannot shake the feeling that Fuentes is in fact bored when discussing Christian subjects. He has to do it promoting his "trad" mission of course. But he comes across as weary of the intense supernaturalism and extravagant hero-worship of Jesus Christ at the core of Christianity.
What does Fuentes really believe in then? Somekind of hermetic-masonic occultism comes with the agent-job I guess, but he is likely too secular even for the vaguest of theosophic beliefs.
He generally seems quite excited when talking about money, fame, sex and power. A vulgar satanist then? I would however suggest a sort of Randian (as in Ayn Rand) hedonist. In it for the dough and the ego-ride and fiercely proud of it.
Yiannopoulos on the other hand could have some real personal attachment to roman catholicism, simply because of its megalomania and grandiose gayness!