by Nix Jeelvy
One of the defining characteristics of the political right in the 2020s is its seething, burning hatred of women. In fact, it is such a dominant streak in the muddled mass that can charitably be called "right wing political thought" that it supersedes almost all other tenets. Indeed, you can be black, brown, yellow, Jewish, you can be a crypto scammer, a traitor, a paedophile, you can even believe in a multiracial right-wing utopia, as long as you tick the all-important box of hating women. It is the Shibboleth of the Alt-Right.
Now, this may seem somewhat contradictory to a movement which purports to be concerned about declining birth rates, in which case all I can really say is "welcome to right-wing politics," where every deeply held, essential belief directly and flagrantly contradicts every other deeply held, essential belief. That is, of course, unless you factor in the all-important catalyst for male-female relations in the right wing mind, which is rape. The plan isn’t to seduce the women, but to subjugate them, bind them in economic (or if necessary literal) chains and rape them into glorious, birthrate-boosting pregnancies.
We can address the right-wing obsession with rape some other time. For now, I’d like to point out something that we used to know in the world before online disinformation poisoned the culture and discourse. Seething, burning hatred used to be a characteristic of one very particular, very queer group of men. In those halcyon days, we called them homosexuals.
It may seem strange to people that gay men should hate women. It is rather counterintuitive. Why should a group of men uninterested in women have any sort of hatred for women? Maybe it’s because women steal all the hot men away, but if a woman could steal your man away, he was never really yours to begin with.
The truth is that gay men resent women because of what women have: the attention of men and the equipment necessary to have sex with them.
Let’s face facts here: anal sex doesn’t exactly come naturally to human beings. The nature of the parts involved, the lack of flexibility that the anus has (relative to the vagina, obviously), the lack of natural lubrication, and of course, the ever-present bodily waste product, for which it was designed, make it a suboptimal sexual experience; especially when compared to good old-fashioned hetero-rogering. Indeed, the checklist of all the steps necessary to safely have anal sex would put the average nuclear reactor to shame. If you’re a heterosexual, it’s not worth the bother.
Let’s face facts here: anal sex doesn’t exactly come naturally to human beings. The nature of the parts involved, the lack of flexibility that the anus has (relative to the vagina, obviously), the lack of natural lubrication, and of course, the ever-present bodily waste product, for which it was designed, make it a suboptimal sexual experience; especially when compared to good old-fashioned hetero-rogering. Indeed, the checklist of all the steps necessary to safely have anal sex would put the average nuclear reactor to shame. If you’re a heterosexual, it’s not worth the bother.
At the heart of every gay man’s being is the desire to be taken and roughly rogered by burly men like the delicate princess he is. Unfortunately, the realities of what men are and the nature of the mechanics involved mean that if anyone is going to get the old 'in-and-out' good and hard, it’s going to be the people who are attractive to burly men and have the requisite receptacle, i.e. women.
Right-wingers tend to have a limited awareness of this. Living as they do in suburban and exurban locales, they don’t, as a general rule, have the opportunity to study gay men "in the wild," so to speak. They haven’t witnessed the spectacle of a despondent, drunk homosexual angrily shaking his fist at the heavens, cursing God because he doesn’t have a pussy. It is quite natural for homosexuals to grow deeply resentful of women, who have what they’ll never have.
Now, that is all what it is, but what relevance does it have to the broader right-wing hatred of women? Dear reader, surely you jest. Surely you have noticed that the old Alt-Right, and the new Dissident Right, and the ever-newsworthy National Populist Right were heavily "manned" with homosexuals. Nonsense, you say! Surely such luminaries of 'back-door action' as Jack Donovan, Costin Alamariu (aka Bronze Age Pervert), Nick Fuentes, Milo Yiannopoulos, or even America’s favourite, couch-molesting closet queen JD Vance have not let their homosexual resentment of women define their rabidly woman-hating ideology! Obviously these individuals have not allowed their own hang-ups about women to infect the minds of their young, impressionable followers.
Indeed, the danger of homosexual leaders to the Alt-Right was always framed as the potential danger of using their authority to pressure young men into having sex with them. The thought of Greg Johnson (I refer to him as someone will inevitably bring him up, although, to his credit, he avoids the default woman hatred) running bathhouse retreats to seduce young lads haunts lots of people’s nightmares, however, this scenario was never much of a serious risk. It is actually very difficult, if not impossible, to argue or pressure a heterosexual man into accepting anal intercourse, and if force or drugs are used, well then that becomes a matter for the police. The much greater danger was always in allowing spiteful queens to imbue young minds with their own hang-ups about sexuality and especially women.
We live in a time when relations between men and women are increasingly fraught and increasingly politicised. This is an unalloyed bad and needs to be addressed soberly and rationally. The last thing we need is for frustrated right-wing gay men to pollute the discourse with their resentment of women, and we especially don’t need them to whisper into the ears of impressionable young men who struggle with dating and relationships.
For this reason, I advise all young men who’re looking for love and female companionship to distance themselves from right wing discourse and its weaponised homosexualism as much as they can.


No comments:
Post a Comment
All Comments MUST include a name (either real or sock). Also don't give us an easy excuse to ignore your brilliant comment by using "shitposty" language.