Who can you trust these days if you can't trust manosphere fitness gurus who hark back to Paleolithic times by eating raw meat and running round in their shorts?
It was too good to be true, but it seems that Liver Man, an internet phenomenon who promoted a "back-to-our-roots," holistic, caveman lifestyle, was a total fraud, who got his impressive muscular results by pumping his body full of disgusting steroids.
His "get jacked like our ancestors" shtick racked up an enormous 1.7 million gullible followers on Instagram and 3.5 million followers on Chinese spay ap TikTok. But his "stone age warrior" image was more a creation of Big Pharma than anything to do with Stonehenge.
The raw-meat-eating Liver King has allegedly been caught admitting to using steroids despite denying such claims in the past. An internet steroid expert by the name of Derek from the YouTube channel More Plates More Dates has claimed to have found significant evidence that the Liver King may not be as natural as he says he is. Derek has always been a believer that the jacked-up man was a steroid user, however, he’s now produced an hour-long video with what he alleges to be definitive proof of the fact....
Within the documentary-length expose, the YouTuber exposes an email between the Liver King, whose real name is Brian Johnson, and a body-building coach. Within the email, the big man admits to taking almost $12,000 pharmaceutical HGH per month, with three injections per day.
The video can be watched here:
Yup, the perfect male form is nothing like Liver Man, who is a disgusting bulbous freak who would stand no chance of survival in the wild. In fact, his artificially overdeveloped musculature would actually render him defenceless by impeding movement and turning him -- and his liver -- into a
tasty hors d'oeuvre for a wild variety of carnivorous fauna.
Even worse, Liver Man would also be an easy rape victim in most American prisons. This is because his toxic overuse of steroids would cause debilitating muscle cramps, meaning it would be less painful for him to take it up the jacksie countless times than to fend off his attackers by actually moving his arms and legs about.
YouTube historian TIK makes the case that the Allied demand for "unconditional surrender" in WWII did not prolong the war. In fact, it may even have shortened the war, given the realistic alternatives to it.
Climate activists like Greta Thunberg are being watched closely now by random people on the internet to see how they are taking the news that sea ice has rapidly increased in recent years.
For years, the Gretas of this world have been the centre of attention, insisting that we should cut back on stuff like meat, cars, and disposable plastic bags, because the global climate is warming up.
However, recent data has noticed a dramatic uptick in the exact opposite of what these people have been claiming, with evidence of global cooling actually increasing!
"It’s a mystery. Why has Arctic sea ice cover roared back so quickly over the last few years? Nobody knows – not one scientist on the planet can tell you, writes Willis Eschenbach in a short essay on the climate site Watts Up With That? It might be noted, of course, that there was no shortage of explanations when there was a cyclical downturn, mostly to do with humans having something to do with it. Ice melting at the Poles is still one of the crucial supports for the entire command-and-control Net Zero political agenda.
The article in the Daily Sceptic also includes the following graph, showing changes in Arctic Sea Ice Cover:
Yes, from 1980 to a few years ago, there was a general trend towards less ice, confirming the environmental alarmist position that gave enormous powers to national governments to start micro-managing the lives of their citizens. But from around 2016-2017, we see a sharp uptick the opposite way, with more ice being formed.
"The above graph shows changes in Arctic sea ice cover during the satellite era. Values are anomalies from the 1991-2020 average. Eschenbach notes that since around 1990, people have been talking about how human-emitted carbon dioxide is reducing the amount of Arctic sea ice. When it started dropping very fast, there was talk we’d passed a ‘tipping’ point from which the ice would never recover. Over this time, noted Eschenbach, predictions of an ice-free Arctic ocean abounded."
In the Antarctic there has been a different pattern. In fact, down there, ice formation started increasing around 2008 before dropping back around 2015 and then increasing again around 2018.
Yes, it seems that the climate picture is a lot more complex than hysterical control freaks like Greta and her gang would have you believe.
No wonder this shrill harpy of climate catastrophe has been keeping a lower profile of late. We can only hope that she doesn't take the climate's refusal to cooperate with her totalitarian agenda in a bad way and do something silly.
I have a tip for her: chill out, Greta, go and relax with a bit of cross-country skiing, or make a snowman or something. Your career as the "Joan of Arc" of the killjoy green movement is dead in the water (or should that be the ice?).
What does the World's greatest man keep on his bedside table? Donald Trump famously kept a copy of a German self-help book called "Mein Kampf" on his; Napoleon a picture of his beloved Josephine to inspire him to victory.
But what does today's greatest man, Elon Musk, keep on his?
The Tesla and Twitter supremo shared his secrets in an intimate tweet to his billions of followers, simply titled "My bedside table." So, what can we learn about the secrets of this business guru?
The picture reveals all. As you can see, he is partial to an occasional sip of Diet Coke and is concerned about his personal safety, having not just one deadly firearm but two. Luckily he doesn't have an alarm clock, or he might accidently shoot himself one dark Winter's morning.
More difficult to decipher, however, is the bright red object on the right side of Elon's bedside table emblazoned with the letters "GA." An internet image search, however, provides some clues:
Yes, it looks like Elon has a standard issue "Tenga" wank can at the ready!
It looks like our "Chief Twit" has been treating himself to an occasional hand shandy or five-fingered handshake to relieve himself of the stress and vile desires that crowd into the mind of the World's foremost genius -- as he thinks about probing the heavens with his rockets and discovering exotic and perhaps erotic new life forms on Venus.
Justin Derby responds to the attempted word-policing of the term "globalist," which some in the media and establishment now claim is an "anti-Semitic slur," even though it has never been used as an anti-Semitic slur historically or in common usage. The woman in the video referenced is actually a good example of a non-Jewish globalist, coming from a South Asian family that failed to assimilate into African society before emigrating to the UK to tell English people what their words mean.
Trump's weak spot was always his love of "the Blacks," as he called them. Is it any wonder, then, that this was the spot selected to attack the former President, in what looks like an attempt to stop him running again? When Kanye West requested a meeting with Trump at Mar-A-Lago, Trump, as usual, was happy to comply:
"Sure Kanye, come along, bring whoever you like..."
So, who did Kanye bring along?
Well, this guy:
Nick Fuentes
And this guy:
Yup, Milo Yiannopoulos. Notice anything funny about Milo here?
Yes, the not so nice new haircut.
In fact, it kind of reminds me of this guy's shitty Hitler-Jugend-inspired haircut from 2016:
Richard Spencer
Yes, this is the same guy who did this crazy shit in 2016:
And was the driving force behind this even crazier shit in 2017:
So much for Milo Yiannopoulos's haircut, which is quite capable of invoking all these associations and linking them with Trump.
Now, what about Nick? Although his optics are a lot better than Spencer's. There's no way you want him near the President either. He has been branded a "holocaust denier" mainly on the back of this video:
And, since then, he has slid towards a more out-and-out "Jew critical" viewpoint:
Anyway, the plan behind Kanye's meeting with Trump -- assuming there is a plan -- seems to be to associate Trump with holocaust denial, sieg heiling, Charlottesville, the Third Reich, and the Cookie Monster.
Nice little bundle there!
Trump seems to have realised this and is working hard at his own form of denialism, by denying all knowledge of Nick Fuentes.
Kanye, meanwhile, appears to have blocked off that route of escape for the President. Here he is dropping Trump right in it, portraying him as a fanboy of Nick Fuentes.
"So, Trump is REAAAAALLLY impressed with Nick Fuentes."
This cuts right across Trump's denial of even knowing who Fuentes is. Hard to see how this works out well for Trump. It's a clusterfuck and Trump is the one being clusterfucked.
But why is Kanye doing this to a guy he claims is a friend?
It's pretty obvious that he got himself into a bad position recently. This means that "the System," "the Deep State," "the globalists" (whatever you want to call them) have real leverage over him.
So, is it unreasonable to suppose that this extremely odd meeting was put together on purpose to crash and burn Trump's chances of running again? I think that's a thesis that should at least be kept in mind as we survey events over the coming months.
It also raises questions about why people like Milo, with his blatant "Spencer 2016" cut, and Fuentes were brought in. Both of them can hardly claim innocence. Both of them must have known they were the toxins being introduced by Kanye to poison Trump's electoral prospects.
One big question remains, however. Why does the Deep State hate Trump so much?
The only suitable answer to that is because they saw his rise as the product of Russian psy-ops. In fact, that's what the Alt-Right in 2016 mainly was, namely an unwitting Fifth Column to get an unwitting "chaos candidate" into the White House that the Kremlin saw as the perfect disruptor of the rival American Empire. What we're watching in a weird way is WWIII.
Read other entries like this in Who's Who in the Dissident Right, an ever-expanding biographical guide to the colorful characters of the "Right Wing"
____________
Bausman's main interest to the student of dissident politics is almost solely as a link between the Kremlin and elements of the fake Alt-Right, most notably Mike Enoch’s TRS and "National Justice Party" (NJP) cluster.
Born 1964, Bausman, is a "German American" who lived in Russia for a long period, and is married to a Russian woman. His father, John Bausman (died 2016) was head of the Moscow bureau of The Associated Press from 1968 to 1972. He appears to have been rather pro-Communist in his leanings.
The younger Bausman, Charles, was educated at Wesleyan University and Columbia University, a notoriously left-wing university.
After graduating, Bausman went to Russia to work in "agribusiness," and married a rather dull, average-looking Russian woman. Not this one:
Women like this are freely available for marriage on the streets of Russia.
After time as a talking head on the failed propaganda channel Russia Today, Bausman set up the notorious Kremlin shill site Russia Insider in 2014. The site stole articles from other dissident sites (including some of mine) and published increasingly toxic and anti-Semitic drivel to "gin up" its audience of Jew-obsessed Alt-Righters to work as an online Fifth Column.
There is evidence of major funding from Russia from 2015 onwards, but it seems likely that the site was Kremlin-backed from the get-go, as 2014 was “Year Zero” for ramping up Kremlin internet ops, following the Democratic Revolution in the Ukraine that humiliated Russian President Putin. Bausman's side-line in "agribusiness" was probably a convenient way for Kremlin money to be channelled to him for his various nefarious activities.
In 2020, it was found that Russia Insider shared the same Google Analytics account as National-Justice.com, linking Bausman directly to Eric Striker, Enoch's chief lieutenant.
According to Lancaster Online, in early 2020 Bausman also bought a 5-acre farm property in Lancaster Pennsylvania for $450,000 mainly for the TRS cluster to use. It was used not only to hold the NJP's 2020 conference, but also as a residence for Greg Conte and Trey Garrison, and a registration address for William Von Diez, a former leader in NJP-affiliated Identity Evropa.
Following the January 6th incident at the Capitol, Bausman was ordered by his Kremlin handlers to immediately flee the USA. They obviously feared that their asset would be arrested and successfully interrogated in the aftermath of that event. He is now believed to be skulking in Russia.
___________________________________
Colin Liddell is the Chief Editor of Neokrat and the author of Interviews & Obituaries, a collection of encounters with the dead and the famous. Support his work by buying it here(USA), here (UK), and here (Australia).
YouTuber Amit Sengupta looks at all the military aid sent to the Ukraine and notices the pay-offs for the West -- a chance to test new weapons system in the field and boost future sales, and an opportunity to get rid of expensive-to-store older stock.
There are cycles of the new “thing,” and for a while it was Ukraine, and it has also been covid, George Floyd, MeToo, and now the protests in Iran. However, there is now some degree of fatigue and weariness about the Ukraine war from the public, rather than the original gung-ho support. While there is less hysteria about Russia than this spring, there are still signs that the war could further escalate. Regardless, the conflict will have long lasting geopolitical ramifications. I waited to write about the war, and while it might be less timely, now is a good time to take a more sober look at the conflict.
People often get accused of being Russian shills for nuanced or “both sides” takes. Certainly Russia is the aggressor and has blatantly violated international law with the invasion. However, there are complexities from a geopolitical standpoint, and it is dishonest to imply that Russia could not have been negotiated with prior to the invasion. Also the unprovoked narrative lets the US and NATO off the hook, due to the push for NATO expansion eastwards, which Russia alleges was a renege upon an agreement at the end of the Cold War. A hypothetical comparison has been made to how the US would flip out if Mexico became part of the Sinosphere, with Chinese military bases in Baja. John Mearsheimer has made the case that the best way to have prevented war, was for Ukraine to have become a neutral buffer zone, aligned with neither Russia nor NATO, and built up economically, doing business with both Russia and the West. However, that would have required agreement from Ukraine, the West, and Russia, and Ukraine assured that it would not be economically isolated. While Western leadership deserves blame for exploiting Ukrainian resentment against Russia, and sabotaging chances for diplomacy, the narrative of Ukrainians as just pawns of a geopolitical struggle, denies Ukraine agency. For instance Ukraine actively lobbied the West for support and Ukrainians wanted to be part of the West for protection and economic benefits, looking at how neighboring Poland became prosperous after joining the EU.
There are comparisons to McCarthyism, in how countering Russian propaganda was used to justify censorship and fact checking. Though canceling usually occurs in waves and then simmers down, and is now less severe than at the beginning of the war, though censorship could ramp up again if there is escalation. There were demands from state officials, such as Victoria Nuland, that tech companies censor certain Ukraine stories, there have been calls to prosecute Russian propagandists as accomplices to war crimes, and some European nations such as Czechia considered imprisoning those who expressed support for the invasion. Though more recently there were mass protests in Czechia demanding neutrality due to the energy crisis. There has also been collective punishment in discrimination against Russian citizens in Europe, which sets a precedent that is radically anti-liberal. However, more recently there has been a softening of anti-Russian xenophobia, such as sympathy for military deserters, with the overall objective to encourage Russian opposition against Putin.
Both sides of the war have propaganda, which is a given in any conflict. Certainly there is Russian propaganda, but it is important to make the distinction between more nuanced points critiquing the establishment narrative and outright Russia propaganda. There are historic cases where falsified information was used to justify war, such as the Kuwait incubator allegations against Iraq during the first Gulf War, which turned out to be fabricated. Certainly there are cases that are suspicious, such as the destruction of the Nord Stream pipeline, which the US had the strongest motive as a culprit, or cases where there was a rush to conclusion, such as the Ukrainian missile landing in Poland, which was initially blamed on Russia, risking a triggering of NATO Article 5. However, there is a lot of blatantly outlandish Russian propaganda, such as alleging that practically every single massacre of Ukrainian civilians is a false flag, and flat out denying any Russian atrocities against Ukrainians. Healthy skepticism of the establishment narrative is good but many dissidents fall into this trap, of opposing any information that aligns with the establishment, which is anti-intellectual, even if the establishment often does lie. While Russia-gate is largely nonsense, Putin’s speech on Two Wests pandered to the Western Right in rhetoric, perhaps to exploit political fragmentation. The Russian state has also adopted woke anti-racist rhetoric against America.
The explanation for pro-Russia sentiment among dissidents is simple, the politics of friend-enemy distinction, as dissidents share the common adversary with Putin, the GAE (Globalist American Empire). While there is a segment of the dissident right that are vehemently anti-Ukrainian, overall they mostly detest the Western elites, who back Ukraine. This also applies to much of the anti-imperialist left, known as “Tankies”. However, many dissident figures who were previously pro-Putin have since denounced Putin, even if just for optics reasons, and some dissident rightest and identitarians support Ukraine on ethnonationalist, pro-European grounds. Overall American dissidents are so demoralized by institutional capture by their political enemies, as well as the ongoing decline of the West and a broken democratic system, that they are willing to look to the outside for allies, even if just symbolically. White identitarians in particular feel like a stateless people and see hostile elites flooding their countries with non-western immigrants, anti-White discrimination in jobs, and crackdowns on free speech, so their gut reaction is to be pro-Putin, or live vicariously through Russian nationalism. While dissident rightest are pro-White, they ironically also have a third wordlist bent, in response to how engrained liberalism is with the West. Putin does challenge the interests of the “Globalist American Empire,” yet is also directly responsible for the deaths of White European civilians, which puts dissident rightests in an awkward position. While one need not be patriotic to the American regime, that does not mean that dissidents should worship any regime that is anti-American. There are parallels with the alienation from America that leftists and Black activists felt during the Vietnam and Cold War, who thus sympathized with the Soviets. Though pro-Soviet Leftists were marginalized and usurped by the New Left, who were backed by the Deep State.
Unfortunately, the war has been framed under symbolic Marvel-like narratives, as a proxy war for our own domestic political ideologies, culture wars, and online discourse, transposed upon a region without respect for its history. For instance having a Russian or Ukrainian flag on one’s Twitter bio is a tribal marker. Besides a lot of boomers and boomer politicians who are still stuck in the Cold War, Putin has increasingly become a symbol of the right due to Russia-Gate. The American liberal establishment views Putin, Trump, and Jan 6th, as inter-connected as part of a global rightwing conspiracy, and associates all pro-European and American nationalism with Putin. Democratic Congressman Jamie Raskin stated that Moscow "is a world center of antifeminist, antigay, anti-trans hatred, as well as the homeland of replacement theory for export," and Raskin practically called for a progressive holy war against Russia. This is absurd and ignores Putin’s Third Worldism, and that Ukrainians are about as conservative on issues of race and LGBTQ as Russians. Regardless, Ukrainians have practically been given honorary POC victim status by the liberal establishment, to the point of becoming the George Floyd of nations, which just further shows how symbolic geopolitics have become and the ultimate sign of living in the simulation.
A video of Ukraine's women-warriors' address to Russians proclaims that "The genetic fund of our nation is reliably protected," was promoted by a journalist tied to mainstream media networks. There is nothing inherently wrong with wanting to protect one’s “genetic fund” from hostile adversaries. However, it is ironic that many of those calling for a domestic war on terror to end the scourge of White Supremacy in America are cynically backing Ukrainian ultra-nationalists, which goes back to having a common enemy. There are further ironic parallels between Russia’s agenda of “denazification,” that denies Ukraine’s right to self-determination on the grounds that Ukraine is “fascist,” and the Democrats’ post-Trump agenda to purge America of its “fascist” elements.
There is a Russian narrative that Ukrainians are just Russians, and Russia would like to see Ukrainians totally assimilated into Russian identity. While it is true that Russians and Ukrainians are related culturally and ethnically, they are two distinct peoples. Russia has also alleged the persecution of ethnic Russians within Ukraine, though Russia lost moral leverage on defending Ukraine’s Russian minority, when they went beyond protecting the separatists, to attack the core of Ukraine. How borders are drawn often does not perfectly align along ethnic lines, which has been the case with many ethnic sectarian conflicts. Also, much of the West’s narrative is framed about defending liberal democracy rather than just Ukraine. While Ukraine’s government is not a liberal democracy, in that it has banned opposition parties, liberal democracy should not be a prerequisite for self-determination. The right to self-determination matters, but is also counter-balanced with geopolitical realities about power, alliances, and demographics.
Since both sides are European, “No More Brother Wars,” the idea that Europeans have learned the lessons of WWII is out the window. While Russia is European in a racial sense and has contributed to Western civilization, there is also a case that Russians are Europeans apart from the West, and that Orthodox Civilization is its own distinct civilization apart from the West. The conflict accelerates the isolation of Russia from the West, and Russia is now much more linked to China and the Global South. The White Western world is uniting behind Ukraine to form a new geopolitical block that is more Euro-centric, and perhaps less concerned for the Global South. There is even growing anti-UN sentiment among liberal internationalists, because Russia and its allies can influence UN security council decisions, and there is growing support for a return to a League of Nations mode of the more “civilized world.” However, so far, the conflict has not seriously undermined woke politics, though who knows if it will, if the war accelerates. The one exception might be for Poland, which is being allowed to be nationalistic, while there was previously an attempted color revolution against Poland.
It is important to have a realistic portrayal of Putin. Putin is not a White Nationalist, Fascist, nor a Bolshevik, nor is he some great visionary either. Putin is basically a reactionary conservative, who’s political basis is a revival of the 19th Century Russian Empire. Putin’s past record is mixed, such as his crackdowns on corruption from the Yeltsin era benefiting Russians economically, and cracking down on Salafist terrorism in Syria. However, the Ukraine war was a blunder that tarnished Putin’s legacy and has done tremendous damage to Russia. Putin had other tools to gain leverage on opposing NATO expansion, such as energy, so Russia’s argument that Ukraine was an existential threat is nonsensical.
There was a window of opportunity for better relations between America and Russia, but due to Russia-gate, American leadership viewed Putin as a Stalin or Hitler-like figure, who could not be negotiated with. We can pontificate different scenarios and how diplomacy could have prevented the war, but the conflict has reached a point where chances for a diplomatic resolution are dwindling, and the US and Russia are beyond the point of no return, as far as having good diplomatic relations. Overall, America’s objective is not humanitarian nor about defending Ukraine’s sovereignty, but rather about maintaining US geopolitical hegemony or the “rules based international order,” and to weaken Russia to foment regime change. Even pro-establishment political scientist, Ian Brenner, stated that the war is about NATO vs. Russia, not Ukraine, and former CIA Director, Leon Panetta, stated that, “We are engaged in a conflict here. It’s a proxy war with Russia, whether we say so or not.” However, recently the US changed its tune on being open to diplomacy, which could be due to the energy crisis, but the US could also be bluffing.
My prediction for the outcome of the war is somewhere in between the mainstream media who are very optimistic about Ukraine defeating Russia, and alternative media outlets who were predicting a total Russian victory, and expecting Russia to take half of Ukraine, with a rump state left in western Ukraine. Ukraine has had more military successes than many anticipated, pushing back the Russian military to the eastern periphery. This is in part due to a home turf advantage of defending their homeland, while Russia’s military shows signs of demoralization. Regardless, Russia still has the advantage of a much larger military. Russia seems unlikely to launch another largescale ground invasion anytime soon, but will likely continue targeting Ukraine’s infrastructure this winter, in order to devastate Ukraine’s economy, exacerbate the refugee exodus, lower morale, and put pressure on Europe to cave in on sanctions.
While the chances of the war escalating to direct confrontation with NATO, and use of nuclear weapons are slim, any possibility of that scenario is catastrophic. I predict an eventual stalemate, in that Ukraine will maintain most of its territory, while Russia holds onto Donetsk and Crimea. Ukraine will likely be economically devastated and depopulated from the refugee exodus, though may eventually join the EU. More likely than direct confrontation is a series of proxy wars between the West against Russia and China, in the Caucasus, Central Asia, the Middle East, and Africa. For instance Egypt vs. Ethiopia, Morocco vs. Algeria, Armenia vs. Azerbaijan, and Uzbekistan vs. Tajikistan. Also Russia’s decline is leaving a power vacuum in many of these regions.
Overall, Russia, Ukraine, and the EU are all losers of the conflict. If Russia is devastated by the war, it could become a Chinese vassal state, which is terrible from a pro-Western standpoint. While many dissidents were predicting the demise of the US at the beginning of the war, US hegemony has actually strengthened, exploiting Europe’s demise with the energy and financial crisis. The UK and EU could become vassals of the US, unless there is an effective nationalist/populist backlash. The war has harmed European nationalists somewhat, such as the AFD in Germany, who were perceived as too friendly towards Russia. However, the energy crisis is a much bigger political issue now, and could energize populist and nationalist politics in Europe. The war has not harmed American nationalist anti-war figures, such as Tucker Carlson, as some had anticipated, though GOP hawks are attempting a comeback in the new congress.
The question is whether one can be pro-Ukraine but also acknowledge other geopolitical factors that portray the West or Ukraine’s government in a negative light. Ideally it should be possible to be for defending Ukraine’s territorial integrity, and denounce Russia’s invasion, but also be able to criticize the US and NATO for exploiting the conflict. Both Ukrainians and Russians have agency and their own histories, and many people who could not point to Ukraine on a map, have made it into a proxy war for their own political tribe. Regardless, in times of crisis and war, polarized narratives often win out.
A German team, weakened by too much moral signalling, has crashed to a humiliating defeat in its opening World Cup game to Japan.
The German team, which desperately wanted to make amends for "The Holocaust," transporting Vladimir Lenin back to Russia in a sealed train in 1917, and buying Putin's gas for the last 20 years, tried real hard to score moral "brownie points" before the game by attempting to wear colourful LGBTQ+ armbands.
When they were not allowed to do this by the harsh Qatari authorities, the team then had an exhausting and tearful nine-hour "struggle session," during which they debated, screamed, denounced, and then hugged each other, before "unanimously" deciding on another piece of pointless moral signalling on behalf of the "international LGBTQ+ community."
This involved posing for pre-match photos with their hands held over their mouth to symbolise "being gagged" by the authorities -- even though they were not planning to wear the armbands on their mouths.
Needless to say, these intensely moral actions left the team emotionally drained and mentally distracted by the time kick-off arrived.
During the match, the German players shuffled listlessly around the pitch while their energetic Japanese opponents, who had prepared for the match by reading politically incorrect manga, pulsed with "kamikaze" energy and "samurai" spirit, running rings around the lumbering Germans and scoring two fantastic goals.
A once anonymous bloggerwho was "outed" in February 2022 as "John Christopher Zander," 55, a software salesman residing in the Northern suburbs of Baltimore. His identity became known due to a data breach at domain registrar and web host Epik, a service he had previously recommended.
He became associated with a "race realist" Alt-Right position around about 2015, but was more of a crusty paleoconservative type. Since 2020, he has written for the rather tame Taki's Mag, which is connected to the UK's mainstream Conservative Spectator magazine. But, despite this "respectability" Zander was strangely afraid of being doxxed, hence his closely guarded Z-man persona. He may be of partial Italian American background, as he rather overreacted to an article that cast aspersions on Italian valour in WWII.
He started his Z-Man blog in 2013, after a history on comment sections and message boards. Relatively sane and nuanced on the JQ and other racial issues, he nevertheless has allowed himself to become associated with actual Nazis, for example by writing for Counter-Currents. He produces rather dull content with a strong streak of "boomer" fatalism and conspiritardary that makes him sound a lot older than he is -- he is actually Gen X. His American insularity was amply demonstrated by him mistaking Morgoth for a Scotsman!
Disturbingly, his chosen avatar is from a "homoerotic" artwork by the German artist Ludwig Thiersch, which shows the German barbarian Alaric the Visigoth being offered a small male childby a dark-haired man for unknown reasons. Make of that what you will.
Connected content:
______________________
Read other entries like this in Who's Who in the Dissident Right, an ever-expanding biographical guide to the dissident right and the sinister forces that attempt to exploit it.
A wider look at the situation suggests that Russia and the Ukraine are busily engaged in fighting the wrong war.
Both countries have vast, sparsely populated tracts of land, but are fighting either to keep them (in the Ukraine's case) or to get even more of them (in Russia's case). But data from the United Nations reveals that soon these vast tracts of land will become even emptier.
The Ukraine, for example, is predicted to see a shocking drop in its population from nearly 45 million before the Russian invasion to around 20 million by the end of the century.
Much of this loss is due to the war and the flood of refugees to the West, but, even assuming the war ends soon, the predictions show the Ukrainian population will continue to plummet, due to low fertility rates, continued Westward migration, and a lack of replacement migration (most Third World migrants are not too keen to do typical Ukrainian jobs like farming or forestry!).
But the situation of Ukraine's enemy, Russia, is hardly much better. According to UN data, its population is also set to decline from around 145 million today to about 135 million by mid-century. On the same time scale as the Ukrainian predictions, this is then expected to shrink to a mere 100 million by the end of the century.
On the face of it, this seems a little better than the Ukrainian picture, but the sad truth is that this is only due to a projected increase in Russia's ethnically non-Russian population. Under current projections, Russia will be a majority Muslim country before 2100.
Bearing the bigger picture in mind, it is clear that both Russia and the Ukraine are busily engaged in fighting an irrelevant war, while ignoring the real dangers.
The war they should be fighting is a moral, social, cultural, and political one to stop their populations plummeting and their lands being transformed into mere "economic exploitation areas" manned by a shifting and dysgenic population of post-Third-World migrants.
The person to blame for this pointless war, however, is the one who started it, namely Vladimir Putin. The sooner he faces his own "Great Replacement," the better!
A meme is a dirty bargain offering you time in exchange for blind trust. Lucien Wolf digs into the memes pushed by Wignats and Black nationalists claiming that Jews dominated the American slave trade. Are these memes factual and what are the sources?
A lowly football game in a far-off desert land, burnt by an unforgiving sun (and blessed by rich gas deposits and the kindness of FIFA), has proved once again that race does not exist and never has existed.
In the battle of men and balls, played on the burning grass, fine men of ebony skin and fine men of ivory skin played interchangeably and racelessly, side by side, in a carnival of physical English oneness and noble brotherhood. In the process six magnificent race-blind goals were scored, proving once and forever that race has never existed, nor need it to ever exist, on our sacred English shores that welcome all creeds, colours, religions, and non-religions.
There was even a tricky moment in the second half, when the sheer interchangeability of English racelessness threatened to expand itself and engulf even the Iranian players on the field of dreams to create a seething, writhing blob of human muscle, limb, and gristle, mixed with hopes and aspirations. But luckily the referee blew his whistle at the right moment and the game continued with two teams instead of one.
It did not matter that five of the six England goals were scored by men of the duskier hue, while only one issued from the boot of a paler individual. These six raceless goals -- taken as one indivisible whole -- proved once again that England is a country like no other, defined by its tolerance and diversity; a country that fought bravely in two World Wars and one World Cup to dance on the grave of the nonexistence of race.
In fact, England and its sweaty brotherhood of toilers on the bending turf is so raceless that it has lost all notion of race, like losing your housekey when you come home shitfaced on a Friday night and having to climb in through your own window.
Yes, England, we salute you. What is race to a nation like ours? This humble contest amid the shifting dunes of Qatar, small in itself but mighty in its ramifications, proved once again that talent and hard work are all that you need to rise to the highest levels of our raceless meritocracy.
There is no need even to take the knee, a crude and divisive American symbol that defeats its own purpose by assuming that race exists and must be denied. It does not! Our English genius has proved this once again. It is even unnecessary to don the gay rainbow armband. Our mighty raceless lions have proved once again how blind we all are to race, and how truly gay we really are.
A subscription platform used mainly to funnel funds to Alt-Righters whom Russia approved of. It was founded in 2017 as an obvious substitute funding channel to make up for PayPal and Patreon heavily demonetising Alt-Right accounts in the wake of Donald Trump's election.
The platform was set up by "Russian-American" Mikhail Zadvornyy with an address in Krasnoyarsk, Russia. This Russian bias became evident when Kremlin-critical Alt-Righters, like Colin Liddell, Greg Johnson, etc., were simply not allowed on the platform, or were soon kicked off (e.g. Richard Spencer).
Zadvornyy has all the classic hallmarks of a Russian asset. Before becoming the facilitator of a massive fund flow to the Alt-Right, he operated as a Leftist disruptor, known as "Red Worker" and running online brands or tags like Red Storm Lab, Red Storm Laboratory, Starcling, and SubscribeStar itself, which, as you may now note, has a clear clue in its title to its affiliation.
In fact, Subscribestar is one of the best pieces of evidence that the Alt-Right from 2014 onwards was largely hijacked to serve the disinfo and disruption agenda of the Kremlin's FSB.
Recent big earners (Kremlin approves)
Read other entries like this in Who's Who in the Dissident Right, an ever-expanding biographical guide to the dissident right and the sinister forces that attempt to exploit it.
It's important that we study people like Alex Jones, not because "he's crazy," but because Jones has made conspiracy theories fashionable. "Secret societies" have become all the rage. From Pizzagate to NXIVM, the case has been made that there are shifty institutions that cater only to VIP members, and God only knows what goes on behind the scenes.
Ever heard of "the casting couch?" It's the same thing. It's been going on forever, since there were freemasons. Even under the Leninist "vanguard," which sold itself as a fake paternalism wishing to control things in the interest of the people, the same creepy dynamic was in play.
If there is anything wrong with the Dissident Right in 2022, it's the niche and backwards belief that a small group of hobbyists or managers should rule and control the entire market, subculture, ideology, and mannerisms of the political right.
This is not news or limited to the Dissident Right or not limited to the Dissident Right. Cliqueism and groomerism are modes of human interraction, and should be recognised as such, as should their tendency to disguise themselves as something ostensibly different and altruistic. Since the time of Trotsky, communists in their own ranks have been in-fighting in order to prove who has the cultural power, and who is really fighting "the culture wars." Even such a goofy term as "metapolitics" arises essentially as a semantic flaw for something a lot more primal.
In fact, I think it's safe to say that there is no such thing as a "culture war" or "metapolitics." Whatever they mean, they were developed by an older generation who passed it along within their own ranks for their own ends. Typically, this is of little use to the younger generation.
Younger kids can't get into or be interested in the far-right because of all the loonies who currently present themselves as its "leaders." Even if a younger audience gets in, they follow the fate of all within "discord culture": they are groomed and brainwashed into thinking they are a part of a "movement" and then exploited or worse!
Also absurd is the Diss-Right policy of "no doxxing." This is something only the political right is invested in. On the other side, the Left is proud to "dox" and destroy the opponent's reputation, and willing to expose the inner workings of their institutions and thoughts, just like Alex Jones exposes Bohemian Grove.
Understanding subculture is an important part of understanding laziness and capitalist control. It's why I highly recommend Dick Hebdige's book on subculture, "Subculture: The Meaning of Style." More importantly, subculture relies on concepts of "loyalty" and a petty teenage "sense of belonging" that you only find at the high school to college level. Sadly, this won't go away within the practice of adult hobbyisms like the Dissident and Alt-Right.
In the Dissident Right trust is relentlessly sub-divided and channelled. New voices are constantly displaced. Those who consider themselves "white nationalists" are pushed into so-called organizations like "Counter-Currents" (run by Greg Johnson in exactly the same way as "Communist Party USA" is run by Joe Sims) or shady Peter Thiel-esque sponsored "gay gloryholes" run from seedy bars.
Greg Johnson's associate Michael Polignano says I am "a doxxer" and not to be trusted. What subcultural nonsense is that? If someone proclaims something, I have the right to demand evidence. That's true for both journalistic and academic reasons. Also, if a person wishes to reveal something about themselves, they don't control further access to that information endlessly.
For my part, I can show clear evidence for what is being said among a group of people, even when so-called "private discussions" happen where individuals want to sexually assault me or threaten me. That's important information. There was never "consent" on that. If someone attempts to blackmail me and says, "that's private information, and I thought I could trust you with that." Well, who said anything about that? If you send me gross, threatening, or hypocritical shit, all of it will be used against you. This is not some odd, unforgivable quirk; it's universal.
The weapon these opponents fear most is information. The constant paranoia that I'm "not to be trusted," and the implication that a virtue like trust exists only so they can do criminal shit like drugs, sex, racist role-playing, and crime sickens me. It's a straight edge ethos to fight as a martyr. I shall not play their games.
I can confront people and make them look like fools just with what they put out. These subcultural fanatics think they can have "liberal safe spaces," when in reality, they are the institutes of Pizzagate and NXIVM! It's not evil to report that they are hypocritical or stupid; it's universal.
To further make my case, Polignano and his little kid friend known as "the New Right Music Review Guy," mentioned something about Juno synthisizers, which I will not further elaborate on, but which represents the shallow hipsterness and youthful ignorance of a young kid falling into Greg Johnson's tender hands.
More hilarious is that Polignano will do one thing and then say you shouldn't do it, and then top it off by pretending that it is "gay" to become a normie. I call these people the "Cult of the Extroverts." During every single Counter-Currents event they insist "what happened today didn't happen, and don't tell anyone about it!" A little extreme, right?
Another CC hanger-on, Claus Brinker, was even worse. He would gossip about me nonstop to Greg Johnson, and I hadn't even done anything. Now he's not a white nationalist and "takes it all back." He's likely some "gay-ass lawyer" in Washington DC and continues to talk shit and condescend to those who have a slight interest in racial politics and far-right subculture. That's what kind of people you run with at Counter-Currents.
Brinker is the caricature of a hipster "homonationalist" going to Philly rooftop parties in order to "save the white race." I just don't understand why Polignano and that one kid are all for Greg, and then all of a sudden, creating a gang against him. A little ridiculous, because it reveals a semantic of white nationalism that is akin to being "in" and "out" of a cool hipster club, or some such stupid shit. It's essentially the same CC groomer cult, except this time run by Polignano.
I feel bad for Polignano. He was a teenager who blew up because he wanted to prove a point back in 2000 that "race was real," and his gay college professor came to rescue him, so they both bonded over William Pierce and moved to expensive San Francisco to start a fiction movement, only to end up exploiting wignats across the country and sharing their expensive flat as a "Grindr pad." (I'm not making this up, as Greg told Mike to leave the place when he wanted "gay Netflix and chill" in 2013, LMFAO).
I can only report what is evidently true and fully backed up. Even worse is somebody telling you at gunpoint that you need to be in a secret Freemasonic society because they're going to do nasty stuff, or just feel guilty because they can't be honest about themselves. The only real crime Greg Johnson has ever committed was being dishonest about his sexuality and getting things his way with his own cult.
The Counter-Currents Philadelphia scene was haunted by wignat dupes, hipster f**s, TRS friends, pagan hardcore kids, etc., and it all came crashing down because Greg acted like a liberal and assumed "it's just to make us connected."
If Polignano and that one kid still want to be mad at Johnson, that won't solve anything. The proof is that Counter-Currents, like any other broken Communist Party, is dust in the wind. Subcultures are as fleeting as the whims and desires of the capitalist market. Still, that arrogant subculture of being "in" and "out," of "no doxxing," still persists. Try to realise that it's just the liberal oligarch class popping in to say racist stuff, rather like the social elite working off its boarding school homosexuality in a gay bathhouse.
Going back to the Antifa point of view, the reason why we have straight edge stuff is to straighten out that tardy behavior, and just be out-and-out honest.
I'm not afraid to say I believe "race is real" and nationalism can be an important credo. However, those who put "the white race" first tend to be the most stupid people I have ever met.
Also, mentioning somebody's name is not a method of "doxxing," whatever you like to call it. I'm only confronting what someone is evidently responsible for. Polignano and other ex-Counter-Current fiends, have to get over this whole "doxing" subculture. It's a complete farce, and it's something that only a previous generation believed in.
The only punk-rock guys left are Jim Goad, David E. Williams, Robert Taylor and Harold Arnold McNeil. Talking to them, you get an entire lecture on the far-right, anti-liberal subculture. No wonder people like Chuck Paulunik, Jack Donovan, Chris Korda, Margret Cho, Doug Stanhope, and Lydia Lunch look up to these people!
I'm sure if I met Polignano in person, we would be cool with one another. I can tell him Matt Forney is not evil. Enough with dissing the weird "school-shooter" kid who did nothing wrong. I never doxxed anyone. This is a semantic farce used against me. I don't belong in your cult, nor do I play fair with "that guy did coke, and you are not allowed to report it."
Fuck you, Polignano. You wrote a book ten years ago, and you ain't gonna write a new one.
Ironically, you can trust me. I'm not evil or mad. I'm actually your friend. I'm actually highly influential in the post-Alt-Right, and I know what I'm talking about.
That generation that's hanging onto "muh White race" or Hitlerian shit is cringe.
Furthermore, I am not a lolcow, hipster with aspergers, or have NPD (narcissistic personality disorder). These are all slanderous attacks against me, because I am different. I don't believe any major figure would ever say these things behind my back, but a weasel friend would. Polignano, along with other Greg orbiters, are the worst.
Literally talking with internet autistic people who never leave the house and who claim they know IRL guys as their close friends is like the girls fighting over Tenchi Muyo! Tenchi is the projected IRL friend that the autist claims is exclusively his.
The best way to sum this up is that it's like the feeling you get when you saw Flipper (1996) in theatres, and at the end, where the credits roll and the screen turns black, loud obnoxious hood rap music blared out, and all the White boomer families awkwardly walked out, slowly but surely. On the same level as that cringey untimely rap music are the liberal "white nationalist" hipsters who want their underground, cocaine-fuelled parties.
I'm here to report on them, and to show everyone else how fucking hypocritical and nefarious they really are to the innocent.
_crop.jpg)
