U.S. DIPLOMAT SUMMONED TO "EXPLAIN" WHY TRUMP IS MURDERING INDIANS IN THE GULF

Trump pretending to win a war he is losing, while attacking neutrals

India has summoned the top US diplomat in New Delhi, demanding answers after US forces attacked a peaceful oil tanker resulting in the deaths of 3 Indian seamen. 

The incident occurred when U.S. forces launched a strike on the Palau-flagged oil tanker MT Settebello, which was carrying a crew of 24 Indian seafarers. According to reports, the vessel was hit in what the U.S. Central Command described as a "precision" operation, like the one that killed around 120 school children on the opening day of the war. The vessel was hit as part of Washington's unilaterally-imposed blockade, an action that itself violates several treaties the US has signed over the years. The other 21 sailors on board the tanker were rescued by Omani authorities.

India's Ministry of External Affairs has lodged a strong protest, summoning U.S. Embassy Deputy Chief of Mission Jason Meeks to "explain" the unprovoked attack on innocent Indian civilians. Officials described the strike as "deeply unfortunate" and called for an immediate end to assaults on commercial shipping in the region. 

This incident is the latest in a series of aggressive, quasi-terroristic moves from Trump that have seen the US torch its soft power and descend to the status of an international pariah state, while also undermining US power and influence around the world, especially vis-a-vis its long-term rivalry with China.

Opposition voices in India have also used the incident to ramp up pressure on the government, accusing it of insufficiently confronting Washington over repeated incidents affecting Indian crews. The summoning of the U.S. diplomat signals growing frustration in New Delhi with Trump's erratic and increasingly desperate behaviour.

THE REFUGEE PARADOX

"Person targeted because of skin colour"

by Colin Liddell

Following an almost successful attempt by a Sudanese refugee to behead a White man in the street (see above), it's kicking off in Belfast. Gangs of men dressed in Black are taking to the streets to show their anger. Stuff has been set on fire.

A number of things need to be mentioned here. The UK government has been struggling for some time to make their "refugee settlement plan" palatable to the general public. They have done this by (a) dispersing refugees across the country and (b) stopping them living together in large groups in the remote towns and cities to which they have been dispersed.

The government seems to have come to the conclusion that as long as they prevent these groups of mainly brown, male, and Islamic refugees lumping together in ghettos or congregating in so-called "refugee hotels," then the problem will disappear, or at least the public will stop noticing.

They have been wrong on both counts, mainly because the refugees have not been cooperating. Yes, I know -- the ungrateful bastards!

In fact, dispersal is absolutely guaranteed to make things worse in certain ways. On the plus side, it makes it harder for refugees to form highly visible ethnic enclaves and then ethnic gangs, but on the negative side it worsens the mental health prospects of each individual refugee. This is because the so-called ethnic gangs and ghetto concentrations, in addition to being a threat to the wider society and a political eyesore for politicians, are also the refugees' own mental health networks. Without these, expect a massive upsurge in alienation levels, insanity, and random acts of brutal violence. 

What we are really dealing with here is what I call "the Refugee Paradox," which is this: There are two kinds of refugees -- fake ones and genuine ones. Given a choice, you should probably opt for the former. This is because a genuine refugee is someone who has suffered great mental torment and stress. Many of them have been tortured or raped; or they have seen their families massacred, etc., etc. -- all sorts of mad shit has happened to them that isn't ever going to be forgotten. At least with the fake ones, you are dealing with people who have not been pushed over the edge.  

There you have it in a nutshell. Refugees are either fake, in which case they should be kicked out for dishonesty and for breaking immigration laws, or they are genuine, in which case they are too mentally damaged and have too many demons to easily fit into UK society.

Indeed, in recent days we see that even non-British people born in the UK have the greatest difficulty adjusting to British society; and I would even go so far as to say that it is even difficult for sane British people these days. Assimilating to a society, even one you're born into and in which your ethnic group is the majority, is an uphill struggle, so we are practically insane to think that deeply traumatised brown people from war-torn countries are going to easily "settle down." Even more so when they have been placed under additional stress by the UK's own "under the radar" and "under the carpet" dispersal strategy, something that separates genuine refugees from their only realistic stabilising force in the UK, namely their own ethnic community.

The only credible way to have a refugee policy in the 21st century is to either limit it to just women and young children, or else to allow refugee communities to naturally form. As these invariably lead to other problems, like gangs and crime, these communities, which would effectively be ghettoes, must be placed under strict control and have their own well-guarded walls or wires in order to prevent harm to the general population. Anything else is just a politician moving his lips.

___________________________________

Colin Liddell is the Chief Editor of Neokrat and the author of Interviews & Obituaries, a collection of encounters with the dead and the famous. Support his work by buying his book here (USA), here (UK), and here (Australia), or by taking out a paid subscription on his Substack.

Follow on Twitter and Bluesky 

SHORTPOD (112) WILL THE MURDER OF HENRY NOWAK CHANGE ANYTHING?

The details of Henry Nowak’s murder, including his arrest while his lungs filled with blood, have rightfully shocked the British public. But does this case point the way to significant abuses that can be effectively countered and reformed, or is it just a lot of sound and fury that will ultimately signify nothing?

FEMALE PILOT INVOLVED IN DEADLY ROYAL NAVY HELICOPTER CRASH

Neokrat, if it stands for anything, stands for raising awareness of the terrible dangers of employing females in challenging male roles, like flying helicopters at night in poor weather.

This is because the empirical evidence stubbornly suggests that this kind of gender blindness drastically increases the chances of something bad happening. And something bad just happened again!

Meanwhile the "institutional wokeness" of the organisations involved means that they invariably brush any inconvenient facts under the carpet.

In the latest example of a woman pressed into a challenging male role leading to disaster, a £40-million pound Royal Navy Merlin Mk4 helicopter crashed into a field in Sourton Down, Devon, England, during a training exercise in the early hours of 3rd June 2026. 

Killed in the crash were Lieutenant Commander Chris Gayson, 42, from Somerset, Lieutenant Lily-Mae Fisher, 31, from Surrey, and Petty Officer Owen Green, 24, from Hampshire. Although cockpit roles have suspiciously not been released, other information from the Royal Navy makes it almost certain that the crash occurred with Lieutenant Lily-Mae Fisher at the controls. 

Petty Officer Owen Green was not trained as a pilot, while Lieutenant Commander Chris Gayson was there in an "assessing role." Meanwhile, according to the Royal Navy article, Lieutenant Lily-Mae Fisher "was tragically killed in a helicopter incident on her final assessment of flying training and was due to be awarded her Pilot’s Wings in June 2026."

The only conclusion to draw from this is that Fisher was at the actual controls when the copter crashed.

Sadly, due to "institutional wokeness," the armed forces in Western liberal democracies routinely insist on treating women like men, despite the fact that this repeatedly leads to tragic and humiliating accidents. 

Last year there was the case of Captain Rebecca Lobach (above), who piloted a $10-million Blackhawk helicopter into an American Eagle Flight near Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport. All 67 people aboard the helicopter and airplane died in the crash.

But it is not just helicopters. In 2024, there was the demoralising case of the New Zealand Navy ship Manawanui, which went down after Commander Yvonne Gray (below) pranged it right into a reef off the coast of Samoa. This was despite the fact that it was a newly upgraded hydrographic survey, salvage, and support ship, with complex sensory equipment.  Rather than going down with her ship, she then insisted on being rescued by men.

In neither of the reports following these horrendous incidents did investigators make any mention of the differences in spatial sense in men or women, or whether either of these ladies were "on the rag" at the time of their cataclysmic misjudgements.

In the modern woke West these are questions that one is simply not allowed ask. How many more lives must be sacrificed on the alter of gender blindness before this madness ends?

LAURA LOOMER SEES THE LIGHT

For a long time Laura Loomer has been something of a MAGA joke figure. But people are complex and even the most absurd individuals can have hidden depths. Also, have I mentioned broken clocks? Anyway, Loomer's recent comment (see below) on Twitter, about how the dissident right is basically just a stooge of Russia, show that she is not entirely beyond redemption and that even MAGA Americans can develop a degree of sapience above that of a glove puppet: 

"I don’t think conservatives realize how much Russian propaganda we have been fed over the last few years as 'independent journalism'.

It’s starting to become very clear to me how many people who claimed to be defenders of the West were just saying that to suck in a pro-West audience so they could slowly brainwash them with foreign propaganda until they could convince their viewers to work against the West. 

Those 'interviews' we all defended were not actually interviews. They were psychological operations meant to weaponize political factions in America for the purpose of pushing foreign interests. 

And many of us fell for it because we let our anger with the system get the best of us and we decided to trust personalities who have never been honest about who they are and where they come from.

I’m starting to think the entire podcast ecosystem is and always has been on giant psychological and information warfare operation. 

Criminals and terrorists no longer need billions of dollars for weapons and aircraft. They just need an influencer and  podcast budget to create more damage to our society than high powered weapons. 

I hope the DOJ will investigate all of this. It’s a shame so many false accusations of Russian collusion were spread over the last 10 years as a way to smear Donald  Trump and his allies with lies, because now that actual Russian interference is here in our media and on social media, nobody believes it’s real. 

It’s starting to get very creepy just how coordinated, organized and well funded this OPP is."

Or maybe Loomer has just had her nose put out of joint by how badly Israel is now doing in the foreign op wars.

SHITMAGNET & MOSSAD AGENT TOMMY ROBINSON HIJACKS ANTI-SIKH PROTEST TO TURN IT AGAINST MUSLIMS

Robinson effortlessly navigating the British moronosphere despite his diminutive size 

It seems that you can't fail by underestimating the intelligence of nationalist Brits. This point has been emphasised once again after professional shit magnet, manlet, and long-term Mossad asset Tommy Robinson hijacked a demo by angry white people protesting against Sikhs and instead turned it against Pakistani Muslims.

The demo was provoked by recent revelations about the murder and arrest of Henry Nowak, an 18-year old white boy by a sword-carrying Sikh thug. Even though Nowak was dying, Britain's woke police, under constant fear of being called "racist," initially arrested and handcuffed the victim, not the perpetrator.

Under UK law, Britain's Sikhs, who are members of a Hindu-related cult that grew up in Mughal India, are legally entitled to carry "ceremonial daggers," something that is now of great concern to the general public in the aftermath of Nowak's murder. 

However, Robinson, instead of criticising the practice of Sikhs carrying dangerous stabbing tools on Britain's poorly-policed streets, instead tried to serve the interest of his Zionist paymasters by framing the attack as an instance of "Muslamic" violence to his low-IQ followers.

Addressing the crowd, Robinson, whose real name is "Yaxley-Lennon," ranted through his cocaine-damaged nasal passages:

"Well done for coming out [for] Henry’s murder. I’ve spoke about this for 20 years. I said you’ll be a victim of a race gang i.e. Pakistani Muslims will [be] beating up a white kid, the police will turn up they jump on the white kids."

While Pakistani Muslims have their own sins to make amends for with regard to the British public (as do Yaxley-Lennon's own of "Irish traveller" ethnic group), the murder of Henry Nowak is not one of them.

Also, many atrocities committed by Muslims in the past may in fact have been provoked by the kind of polarisation ops that Mossad and the Zionist lobby have a long track record of secretly running.

The ethnic background of the man telling low-IQ British that a Sikh is a Muslim

UKRAINIAN A.I. DRONES ARE DESTROYING PUTIN'S ARMY

Ukraine's long-term approach to the war (focusing on developing tech and gearing up production in cooperation with Europan supporters) is increasingly outpacing Russia's short-termist approach ("Muh 3-day SMO"), according to Ukrainian war blogger Ukraine matters, who draws attention to the innovative way Ukraine is using AI to enhance in battlefield drone dominance. Taking a particularly painful hit right now are Russia's awkwardly extended logistics to the Crimea.

NAZIISM, A 21st CENTURY DEFINITION

by Colin Liddell

I know I shouldn't, but I've been thinking about Naziism again.

It's not really down to me. It's really down to all the other people on social media who constantly use the term as if it's a magic kill shot or something.

It isn't. It's just a word, and like lots of words, it may mean something or it may mean nothing; or it may mean something on one day, to one person, and something else, completely different, to someone else on a different day (or 5 minutes later).

Anyway, it's one of those terms that won't go away, so, if it's going to stick around, which it clearly is, we should at least ascribe some sort of robust meaning to it.

The mainstream meanings that you encounter with this word, are all coated in a sickly goo of extreme hystericism, so none of those meanings will do.

Indeed, if you think about the two main problems in the world today, Ukraine and Middle East (or to be more precise the Russians and the Israelis) and correlate this fact with the now extremely awkward fact that the two groups that Hitler was trying to hardest to remove from the face of the earth were (ahem) the Russians and the Israelis, you can at least say that this whole "Naziism thing" is becoming a little less black and white than it used to be.

Recently there's been a new Naziism spat between online Poles and others over President Zelensky' reported "decision" to allow a Ukrainian military detachment to name itself after Stepan Bandera's Ukrainian Insurgent Army. Bandera is a controversial figure from WWII history whose militia participated in atrocities.

But even though this story is sourced from RT.com and pumped out through fake news sites like The Irish Sun, a lot of Poles fall for it. 

Of course, Russian propaganda usually pushes on something that is already there, and it is true that some Ukrainian nationalists venerate Bandera as a national icon, even though the Ukrainian state does what it can to distance itself from him, as this association with Bandera plays into fake Russian accusations that the Ukraine is a "Nazi state" and tends to undermine its relationship with Poland, a natural ally in the struggle against Russia. 

The awkward fact for the Ukrainian government, however, is that Bandera remains something of a hero for certain Ukrainians and was  indeed involved in various atrocities against Poles in World War II even if some of the historical sources, Soviet, etc., are far from reliable.

Possible genuine image of Ukrainians with Stepan Bandera banner.

The broader fact, however, is that East European history between 1914 and the 1945 (when some sort of totalitarian order was imposed by the Stalinist goons) was a total shitshow.

If you take any prominent Russian, Pole, Ukrainian, Ruthenian, Slovak, Croatian, Rumanian, Hungarian, or German active in the Slavosphere in that period, then you have a more than 50% chance that they were involved in some kind of horrifying ethnic atrocity or brutality against somebody. So, even if some Ukrainians do want to brand themselves "The Stepan Bander brigade," reacting to this as if Poles never did anything bad themselves is a special form of snow-flakism. 

In fact, just to put this on a historical footing, the Poland that emerged from WWI (and following a short war with the Soviet Union) had rather too much land belonging to other ethnicities, which inevitably involved it in brutalities against those groups. In short, Bandera didn't just happen in a vacuum.

In 1930, in response to unrest in the ethnic-Ukrainian parts of Poland, the Polish government launched the "Pacification of Eastern Galicia" with police and military units conducting mass searches, arrests, beatings, the destruction of Ukrainian community centres, libraries, cooperatives, and property, plus crop damage. This involved widespread brutality and intimidation as well as killings of Ukrainians.

Needless to say, both sides amplify or minimise the atrocities of the other, but the essential difference is that the Ukrainian atrocities against Poles happened during WWII, while those of Poles against Ukrainians happened during a period of relative peace, so, for that reason alone, the Ukrainian atrocities  probably edge it.

I won't bother going into what either group did to the Jews, although it probably has a lot of bearing on how Israel turned out as we now see it in 2026. 

All this talk about interethnic atrocity under conditions of major geopolitical struggle leads onto what Naziism truly is, and a more workable definition that should be used going forward.

It is clear to any objective person who is not personally involved in the hatreds, rivalries, and complexes of these various groups that many, if not all, of the atrocities that occurred in the Eastern European segment of WWII were directly attributable to the storms and stresses of fighting a particularly nasty war.

This was a war, remember, where it constantly seemed that just one more spurt of ruthless brutality would either slow down the invaders, cause the invaded to implode, or stave off the vengeful victims when they decided to do a bit of invading themselves.

I don't really want to get into the long grass here and start doing tedious historical detail, but to just chuck one example on the pile, the Nazi brutalities that occurred in the Kiev area in 1941 were clearly sparked off by some rather nasty work by the NKVD, whose sappers and engineers had pre-placed radio-controlled mines and delayed-action explosives in key buildings before retreating (or being captured).

These detonated starting around 20th of September 1941, causing significant damage and German casualties. The buildings targeted, included hotels used by officers, the Citadel, the Old Arsenal, and other prestigious buildings that the Germans predictably and quite stupidly occupied.

An NKVD booby trap bomb goes off in Kiev to "welcome" the Germans

These little surprise packages, often rigged to have a "double tap" effect, also caused fires that destroyed much of the downtown area of Kiev and killed over 200 German soldiers, some of them middle-ranking officers, and left tens of thousands of Ukrainians homeless.

Yes, what I'm claiming here is that the "poor wittle Nazis" were radicalised by a cunning series of Kremlin-installed booby traps, creating not only direct death and mayhem, but also a severe loss of face (sometimes literally). Remember, this was the same Wehrmacht that had executed and massacred around 6000 Belgian civilians on its passage through peaceful little Belgium in 1914!

This loss of face was a serious problem, as the Germans had little they could legitimately do in response. "The invisible enemy" in this case had already fled or was hidden in the general population. However, doing nothing and continuing to look weak was not an option either in a do-or-die war like that on the Eastern front. Blindly retaliating against the general population, as they had done in Belgium, was an option but not a very good one because it would alienate the general population and make control of rear areas even more difficult. The solution the Nazis hit on was to make use of the pre-existing "racism infrastructure," so to speak, and to scapegoat and "make an example of" the one group who had long fulfilled this function in Eastern Europe and elsewhere.

One could get into endless and pointless debates about German racial theories and whether they were "complete bollocks" or "actually on to something," or even if there was anything new in them or not (there wasn't). But the fact is Naziism and Nazi anti-Semitism, such as it was, could have taken quite a different path to the one it took if Germany had not got itself enmeshed in a meat-grinding existential war with three Superpowers. 

For example, under more benign conditions, the Nazis might have taken a leaf out of the book of the Poles themselves, who in addition to the occasional "petty" pogrom, were actively encouraging many of their Jews to relocate to the British mandated territory of Palestine before WWII, while also smuggling weapons to them. These weapons, by the way, were used not just against the unfortunate Arabs, but also the hapless British who were trying to keep the peace down there.

Or else a calmer and less-stressed Hitler might have realised that Jews were actually Germany's "secret superpower" and have decided to use their scientific know-how to help Germany develop the A-bomb first, instead of chasing their scientists off to America to work on the Manhattan project.

So, once you blow off the hysterical and emotional froth, and boil it all down, "Naziism," at the end of the day, is really just the messy and often moronic process of fighting a particularly nasty war; and the two people mainly responsible for that today are a certain Eurasian midget with man boobs in the Kremlin and a slimeball in Tel Aviv.

___________________________________

Colin Liddell is the Chief Editor of Neokrat and the author of Interviews & Obituaries, a collection of encounters with the dead and the famous. Support his work by buying his book here (USA), here (UK), and here (Australia), or by taking out a paid subscription on his Substack.

Follow on Twitter and Bluesky