Vlad Vexler explains that even though Putin has lost a friend in Maduro, he is still quietly pleased with Donald Trump's trashing of the international order. The "Donroe Doctrine," as Donald Trump has christened his policy of hemispheric piracy, aligns perfectly with Putin's own faltering attempt to reboot his own Hitlerist dreams.
Thursday, January 8, 2026
Wednesday, January 7, 2026
SHORTPOD (110) WHY AMERICA ELECTS SENILE & INSANE PRESIDENTS
America has been electing mentally deficient Presidents for a long time. In the past the problem was managed and contained. Now, thanks to the toxic insanity of Trump, the problem can no longer be ignored. The politicians and the voters share some of the blame, but much of it is also a “structural problem”: in a vast country filled with so many low-info voters, it is the oldest, most senile, and occasionally maddest candidates who have the best chance of achieving the “name recognition” necessary to become President.
Tuesday, January 6, 2026
MAGA "THIRD WORLDISM" AND J6
by Nix Jeelvy
Well, it’s January 6th today, so I might as well write about it.
The January 6th rioters deserved to be arrested. Whatever else they may have been before that day, on January 6th, 2021, they made themselves into the willing foot soldiers of a Zionist, Putinist paedophile. They illegally entered the US capitol building with the intent of doing harm to elected representatives of the American people. They moved in, armed with foreign, Russian-made ideologies. They very openly wanted to "hang Mike Pence." These were all crimes.
More to the point, none of these people were ideologically aligned with white interests. Many of us white identitarians believed they were at the time, due to the unfortunate association between white identity politics and the political right.
I found myself advocating for their release out of a sense of misguided comity. Of course, as an opponent of the orange paedophile, even back then, I blamed him for manipulating them into storming the capitol building. I shouldn’t have.
There was no pro-white argument to be made for Trumpism, which is a mode of government more suited to Gulf Arabs than people of European heritage. There were, however, many right wing arguments to be made for Trumpism, so in the mistaken belief that white identitarian thought is or should be right wing, we defended these terrorists. We shouldn’t have. It was a grave error for which we are still paying.
Trump is not a magician, nor is he a hypnotist. These people flew to Washington, many of them on private jets which they owned (they mostly belonged to the American gentry class) specifically in order to intimidate, injure and ultimately kill the congresspeople and election officials. They were psychologically incapable of accepting the fact that Joe Biden beat Donald Trump in the 2020 election because they were (and many still are) members of the MAGA cult.
The Biden administration locked some of them up, but it wasn’t enough. Let’s face it, they deserved a lot worse. If Biden hadn’t been such a softie, and if he hadn’t allowed his conciliatory nature to cloud his judgement, he would have put these cocksuckers’ heads on spikes. Joe Biden, being the quintessential naïve white liberal, believed that letting bygones be bygones and focusing on strengthening America’s economy after the dual shitshow of Trump’s first term tariffs and the COVID lockdowns, would make the other side drop their insane commitment to tearing down the Republic in the name of enthroning their paedophile cult leader.
Joe Biden assumed that he was dealing with men like himself: passionate, driven, but capable of appreciating kindness and forgiveness. He believed that the MAGAtards were fair-minded white men who had genuine grievances, which had been hijacked by a dilettante. He believed he could talk down the lunatics from their suicidal rampage. He did not know, and indeed, we did not know then what we know now: that while some MAGAtards may look like civilised human beings, they are as incapable of appreciating kindness and forgiveness as the most spiteful barbarians. This failure to understand the nature of the beast(s) was to be America’s undoing.
The January 6th rioters were nothing more than the first generation of American "vatniks," no different from the kind of Russian orc that charges into Ukrainian drone swarms in the name of their degenerate paedophile tsar. They are contemptible scum, which the American justice system failed to prosecute because American liberals have been complacent and forgot that there is genuine evil in this world, including a genuine "will to serfdom" among many and a genuine yearning to "be free of freedom" and kowtow to authority figures who will tell them what to do and absolve them of moral responsibility.
In the years since, the number of American vatniks has grown considerably. They now form the backbone of the anti-civilisational rot eating away at the heart of the Republic. Even as I write these words, they are beating the war drums for an annexation of Greenland and Canada, hoping in vain to assuage their feelings of inferiority with regard to their European betters.
In the years to come and as the world is engulfed by conflict as a direct result of Donald Trump’s insanity, we should remember that a few high profile hangings and decapitations would have spared us the rivers of blood. And for that, I blame Joseph Robinette Biden, who could not find the resolve to crack some empty rightoid heads in the aftermath of the 2020 election.
TRUMP'S "BRILLIANT" PLAN FOR VENEZUELA REVEALED
Trump's plan for transforming Venezuela from a corrupt narcostate into an even more corrupt petrostate has rightly been called "brilliant," "astounding," and even "the best ever" all by Donald Trump himself. It is truly awe-inspiring both in its visionary sweep and profound attention to detail. One can only gasp in amazement at the good fortune of the Venzuelan people at being the beneficiaries of such genius.
Here, then, is the full plan, broken down for mere mortals to consume in a step-by-step guide.
Step One: Blow up a lot of shit, kill Cuban guards, kidnap the Chavist President. Fingers crossed!
Step Two: Fuck off out of the country.
Step Three: Ignore the legitimate opposition because they (a) "stole" Trump's Nobel Peace Prize and (b) don't suck up to US oil companies.
Step Four: Pretend to run the country and that US oil companies will soon be arriving.
Step Five: Ignore the story when the Chavists merely appoint another Chavist politician as President with the backing of the Chavist army, and the US oil companies continue stay away due to nothing important having changed in the country.
Step Six: If necessary, distract from this mess (and the Epstein Files) by either attacking Colombia, Cuba, Mexico, or Greenland.
Monday, January 5, 2026
TRUMP GOES CRACKERS IN CARACAS
Nix Jeelvy comments on the latest piece of asshole-shaped insanity from everybody's "favourite" senile, unhinged, criminal, clown boomer, namely the present serving President of the United States.
Sunday, January 4, 2026
AN INITIAL APPRAISAL OF THE "TRUMP DOCTRINE"
Wars are not won and empires are not forged by asymmetrical battles between First World special forces and sleepy and corrupt Third World guards, so, if you are chest-thumping over Trump's "coup" in kidnapping Nicolas Maduro, then you may well be a moron or at least moron-adjacent.
Is there anything more substantial to this Trump "Neo-Imperialist" thing that seems to be underway? Is there an actual "Trump Doctrine" and, if so, what is it and is it at all workable?
Let's assume that there is such a thing as a Trump Doctrine and that we can fill in the blanks from (a) the recently published National Security Strategy document, (b) the actions of Trump and the "justifications" he gives, and (c) what we know about Trump more generally. After that, we have to consider how this doctrine aligns with what we know about America and Americans to decide whether it has any long-term prospects, like, say, the Monroe Doctrine.
If we just look at the recently published National Security Strategy document, then the Trump Doctrine is totally amoral or even immoral in that it places dictatorships on an equal or superior footing to fellow democracies (America is still a democracy until Trump rounds up his political opponents and has them shot). In particular, the National Security Strategy denounces attempts to apply Western morality on other countries:
The National Security Strategy also implies a multipolar world, with the big strong countries, among whom Trump erroneously includes the "Second World" state of Russia, each having its own sphere of influence:
But this respect for the "backyards" of other big powers is counteracted by the actions of Trump and his administration which continues to dabble in places like the Ukraine, Syria, and the First Island Chain off the coast of China.
Trump's apparent respect for multipolarity and his tolerance for "diverse" political systems is patchy at best and is always overridden by the prospect of cutting a deal that can benefit America (or more precisely American businessmen with "favourable" ties to the Trump administration).
Next, the Trump Doctrine clearly believes in using military action without any of the moral or humanitarian guard rails that former administrations at least made some attempt to adhere to. However, there is still a need to provide a tenuous moral justification for bombing and killing people, as we see in the case of Venezuela, where the action was morally predicated on the fact that some drugs from Venezuela were reaching America and that some formerly US-owned assets in the country were nationalised around 20 years ago.
Needless to say, this kind of moral justification for violence in no way limits its application. Based on this casus belli, America could theoretically invade Mexico tomorrow and Canada the day after that, as America's massive appetite for narcotics (it is the true narcostate) draws in harmful substances from every corner of the globe. Likewise with national restrictions on American capitalism. The nationalisation of US oil assets in Venezuela is no more a cause of war than the EU's decision to recently fine a prominent US businessman 120 million euros.
So, the Trump Doctrine is effectively just the right of an aggressively assertive and militarily dominant US state to attack any other state that is deemed at variance with the gross financial interests of America and its leadership.
But the real test of a doctrine is whether it is realistic beyond one or two special cases. Attacking someone as incompetent and unpopular as Maduro was an extremely low bar. The Monroe Doctrine is well established because it was a reasonable doctrine that enjoyed significant outside support, most notably from the entire American public, the British Navy, which effectively enforced it for most of its history, and other New World states.
The Trump Doctrine, however, seems to have a much narrower base of support, namely the clique around the President and boomertard patriots who use the transitory achievements of the American military as a substitute for the inactive nature of their genitalia.
Also, it is clear that another hard limit on the Trump Doctrine is America's inability to suffer casualties. This is usually the killer for any American President trying to establish a new doctrine. I mean, no one remembers the "Reagan doctrine" of stabilising the Middle East or the "Bush and Clinton doctrine" of helping out messed up African states, both of which collapsed at first contact with the Grim Reaper in Beirut and Mogadishu.
Even the Trump Doctrine's successful visit to Maduro's presidential hidey-hole was treading on geopolitical eggshells and essentially riding its luck. One crashed copter or Maduro escaping would have cast quite a different light on this operation, pushing it towards the aborted "doctrines" that lay behind the Bay of Pigs and President Carter's failed attempt to rescue the US hostages in Iran.
By my estimate, almost any US Presidential doctrine that doesn't have widespread international support can be killed by the loss of between 29 and 265 US servicemen (the numbers killed in Mogadishu and Beirut).
Of course, due to the cultural and moral degradation of the American people in the period since the 1990s, this figure may have been pushed a little higher, especially when using contracted mercenaries, but the number is still relatively low and will ensure that the Trump Doctrine, such as it is, will have a very limited lifespan.
Is there anything more substantial to this Trump "Neo-Imperialist" thing that seems to be underway? Is there an actual "Trump Doctrine" and, if so, what is it and is it at all workable?
Let's assume that there is such a thing as a Trump Doctrine and that we can fill in the blanks from (a) the recently published National Security Strategy document, (b) the actions of Trump and the "justifications" he gives, and (c) what we know about Trump more generally. After that, we have to consider how this doctrine aligns with what we know about America and Americans to decide whether it has any long-term prospects, like, say, the Monroe Doctrine.
If we just look at the recently published National Security Strategy document, then the Trump Doctrine is totally amoral or even immoral in that it places dictatorships on an equal or superior footing to fellow democracies (America is still a democracy until Trump rounds up his political opponents and has them shot). In particular, the National Security Strategy denounces attempts to apply Western morality on other countries:
"We seek good relations and peaceful commercial relations with the nations of the world without imposing on them democratic or other social change that differs widely from their traditions and histories."
The National Security Strategy also implies a multipolar world, with the big strong countries, among whom Trump erroneously includes the "Second World" state of Russia, each having its own sphere of influence:
"This does not mean wasting blood and treasure to curtail the influence of all the world’s great and middle powers. The outsized influence of larger, richer, and stronger nations is a timeless truth of international relations."
But this respect for the "backyards" of other big powers is counteracted by the actions of Trump and his administration which continues to dabble in places like the Ukraine, Syria, and the First Island Chain off the coast of China.
Trump's apparent respect for multipolarity and his tolerance for "diverse" political systems is patchy at best and is always overridden by the prospect of cutting a deal that can benefit America (or more precisely American businessmen with "favourable" ties to the Trump administration).
Next, the Trump Doctrine clearly believes in using military action without any of the moral or humanitarian guard rails that former administrations at least made some attempt to adhere to. However, there is still a need to provide a tenuous moral justification for bombing and killing people, as we see in the case of Venezuela, where the action was morally predicated on the fact that some drugs from Venezuela were reaching America and that some formerly US-owned assets in the country were nationalised around 20 years ago.
Needless to say, this kind of moral justification for violence in no way limits its application. Based on this casus belli, America could theoretically invade Mexico tomorrow and Canada the day after that, as America's massive appetite for narcotics (it is the true narcostate) draws in harmful substances from every corner of the globe. Likewise with national restrictions on American capitalism. The nationalisation of US oil assets in Venezuela is no more a cause of war than the EU's decision to recently fine a prominent US businessman 120 million euros.
So, the Trump Doctrine is effectively just the right of an aggressively assertive and militarily dominant US state to attack any other state that is deemed at variance with the gross financial interests of America and its leadership.
But the real test of a doctrine is whether it is realistic beyond one or two special cases. Attacking someone as incompetent and unpopular as Maduro was an extremely low bar. The Monroe Doctrine is well established because it was a reasonable doctrine that enjoyed significant outside support, most notably from the entire American public, the British Navy, which effectively enforced it for most of its history, and other New World states.
The "Monroe" Doctrine
The Trump Doctrine, however, seems to have a much narrower base of support, namely the clique around the President and boomertard patriots who use the transitory achievements of the American military as a substitute for the inactive nature of their genitalia.
Also, it is clear that another hard limit on the Trump Doctrine is America's inability to suffer casualties. This is usually the killer for any American President trying to establish a new doctrine. I mean, no one remembers the "Reagan doctrine" of stabilising the Middle East or the "Bush and Clinton doctrine" of helping out messed up African states, both of which collapsed at first contact with the Grim Reaper in Beirut and Mogadishu.
Even the Trump Doctrine's successful visit to Maduro's presidential hidey-hole was treading on geopolitical eggshells and essentially riding its luck. One crashed copter or Maduro escaping would have cast quite a different light on this operation, pushing it towards the aborted "doctrines" that lay behind the Bay of Pigs and President Carter's failed attempt to rescue the US hostages in Iran.
By my estimate, almost any US Presidential doctrine that doesn't have widespread international support can be killed by the loss of between 29 and 265 US servicemen (the numbers killed in Mogadishu and Beirut).
Of course, due to the cultural and moral degradation of the American people in the period since the 1990s, this figure may have been pushed a little higher, especially when using contracted mercenaries, but the number is still relatively low and will ensure that the Trump Doctrine, such as it is, will have a very limited lifespan.
___________________________________
Colin Liddell is the Chief Editor of Neokrat and the author of Interviews & Obituaries, a collection of encounters with the dead and the famous. Support his work by buying his book here (USA), here (UK), and here (Australia), or by taking out a paid subscription on his Substack.
Follow on Twitter and Bluesky
Follow on Twitter and Bluesky
Saturday, January 3, 2026
"TRUMPENYAHU" REGIME KIDNAPS PRESIDENT OF VENEZUELA
America has become a tribute act to the IDF
The details are still a little fuzzy, but it appears that the Trump regime has moved the geopolitical goal posts yet again by kidnapping Nicolas Maduro, the President of Venezuela.
So that the South American dictator wouldn't feel too lonely on the trip to Trump's Mar-a-Lago Palace, US special forces also kidnapped his wife.
This is yet another escalation in Donald Trump's frankly unhinged behaviour since he was re-elected President in 2024. Since the start of his second term, Trump appears to have been deeply influenced by the "proactive" approach to geopolitics associated with Israel, and to have been modelling himself on Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu, who is considered a "war criminal" and "terrorist" in many jurisdictions.
The Israeli approach is, of course, characterised by sudden, unexpected military attacks, strikes, and assassinations, with scant moral cover being provided by calling the victims of such operations "terrorists." This is now increasingly the Trump playbook.
But while Israel's radical policy is motivated by its incredibly insecure geopolitical position and decades of terrorist or guerrilla attacks on its soldiers and people (as well as the Holocaust), the Trumpenyahu regime's new "state terrorism" is mainly motivated by Donald Trump desperately trying to keep the Epstein files out of the news cycle for another day.
The Israeli approach is, of course, characterised by sudden, unexpected military attacks, strikes, and assassinations, with scant moral cover being provided by calling the victims of such operations "terrorists." This is now increasingly the Trump playbook.
But while Israel's radical policy is motivated by its incredibly insecure geopolitical position and decades of terrorist or guerrilla attacks on its soldiers and people (as well as the Holocaust), the Trumpenyahu regime's new "state terrorism" is mainly motivated by Donald Trump desperately trying to keep the Epstein files out of the news cycle for another day.
One month ago