Pages

Pages

Thursday, November 13, 2025

SUPPORT FOR TRUMP'S "WAR WITH VENEZUELA" IN THE TOILET

 


The drip-drip-drip release of the Epstein Files, combined with Trump's dipping approval ratings, and electoral set-backs for his party, increases the pressure on the President to find a big messy distraction, like a war.

Although there might be perfectly good realpolitik reasons for "offing" Maduro -- and risks -- the main utility of such a conflict for Trump now is that it might just temporarily get people to forget about his very close connection with paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. So, with the "Epstein Files" trending again, the chances of war may seem to be increasing.

But just how popular (or unpopular) would such a war be?

Sadly for Trump (and Marco Rubio, who is pushing hard for the war) Americans are very unenthusiastic about anything that pulls them out of Costco or their favourite shopping mall for a few minutes. 

A YouGov poll conducted 5th-8th September put support for US invasion of Venezuela at only 16% with 62% opposed. Even among Republicans, only 31% support the idea and that's probably because they assume it will be a walkover. 

If the question is the use of "limited force to overthrow Maduro" support only climbs two points to 18% with 46% opposed and 36% don't know.

Yes, a few air sorties and special ops producing a major low-cost geopolitical victory for the United States can only produce less than 1-in-5 support! This is the problem with America being an "empire," it has the most unimperial people. Mentally and culturally most Americans are still fighting against the "evil tyranny" of King George III who dared to impose a piffling tea tax on them. 

The highest level of support the Neocon hawk party can get is 27%, but that is only for strikes on drug boats in international waters. This is also opposed by 42% of Americans, some of whom are probably peeved by having their drug imports interdicted by "patriots" the same way tea drinkers in New England must have been pissed at the Boston Tea Party in 1773.

So, based on these numbers, which will be percolating through every level of the Republican Party, I would say that the likelihood of a US attack on Venezuela remains low.

___________________________________


Colin Liddell is the Chief Editor of Neokrat and the author of Interviews & Obituaries, a collection of encounters with the dead and the famous. Support his work by buying his book here (USA), here (UK), and here (Australia), or by taking out a paid subscription on his Substack.

Follow on Twitter and Bluesky

Wednesday, November 12, 2025

WHO'S WHO IN THE DISSIDENT RIGHT: NICK FUENTES



Fuentes needs no introduction in these circles and indeed even in the mainstream now, thanks to Tucker Carlson, the big papers 'profiling' him, and the Trump administration ripping off his trollish social media style.

Nick is immensely talented, extremely witty, and often makes excellent points, as well as ridiculously stupid ones, which he then passes off as "ironic" or "knowing" jokes, etc., all adding to his appeal. But this is irrelevant next to what really drives him, which, in my view, is a deeply repressed homosexuality. 

Let's follow this a little deeper. Here is Fuentes talking about his followers (young men or teenage boys) giving up marriage and essentially heterosexual sex to follow him into the deeper Groyper movement: 


The point made, sacrificing for the movement and the "greater good" has a degree of logic and plausibility, but essentially this is just a closeted gay man using all his wit, intelligence, and charisma to push other young and malleable men into an all-male, defeminized space that will increase the chances of "gay things" happening. 

The psychological driver of closeted homosexuality may also be behind his supposed avowal of "Christian Nationalism." This is sometimes seen as a clever ploy to remain nationalistic while avoiding the "toxic" positions of being an ethno-nat or wigger, but Catholicism and the "monkish" all-male lifestyle it promotes has long held an undeniable appeal for gay or sub-masculine men just like Fuentes. He clearly isn't the least bit interested in the actual teachings of Catholicism!

The bottom line here is that whatever Fuentes says, whether you find yourself nodding along in amused agreement or not, essentially all flows from the psychological engine of repressed homosexuality, or at least is tinted by it. 

Regarding Fuentes' career there are many theories about who he is "really" working for, and you can take your pick. But looking at his past, it should be remembered that he was one of the recipients of a highly suspicious bitcoin donation back in December 2020, paid to several members of the Dissident Right just prior to the attack on the US Capitol on January 6th. This supposedly came from Laurent Bachelier, a Frenchman, who later, it was claimed, committed suicide.

The spread of the donation  paints an interesting picture of the dissident right at the time.


Fuentes r
eceived 13.5 bitcoin (around $370,000 at the time) and then attended and spoke at J6, but appears to have avoided breaking any laws (although opinions vary on this and why Fuentes was then not prosecuted).

In February 2021, Patrick Casey, his "Number 2" in the America First movement, who received a smaller donation (see above), broke with him, supposedly over his participation at J6.

Fuentes may also have been a major recipient of the wave of donations paid out by the Kremlin to dissident righters to bolster Kremlin narratives shortly before the 2022 invasion of the UkraineSuffice to say, all those accounts, including Fuentes', turned out to be intensely pro-Russian in the years ahead and continue to be so.

For example, in February 2022 at his America First Political Action Conference (AFPAC), Fuentes asked the crowd: "Can we get a round of applause for Russia?" with the audience responding with chants of "Putin!" 

In March 2022, Fuentes praised Putin as a "Czar" and "Liberator" for launching the invasion of Ukraine, claiming it was intended to "liberate Ukraine from "the Great Satan" and from "evil empire" (i.e. United States), dismissing in the process concerns about Russian war crimes, which had then surfaced. He also tweeted: "I know it’s not exactly politically correct but I support tsar Putin’s right to denazify the illegitimate state of Ukraine!"

But there are other problems with Fuentes' past. In April, 2021, Fuentes was famously banned from flying. He claimed that this was "political oppression" by the Biden administration. However, this story appears to be untrue, as Fuentes himself reported on Twitter that he had been involved in a confrontation with airline staff in December 2020 over his reluctance to wear a mask during Covid.


This refusal to cooperate with health rules during a global health crisis forced the plane to return to the gate, after which Fuentes was kicked off and black-listed by private airline companies. He then continually lied about the reason for his so-called "flying ban" for months, and still lies about it today.

On the plus side, his relentless critique of Israel and Jewish influence in the USA, which once looked like "rabid anti-Semitism" is now much more "in line" with the zeitgeist following two years of genocidal war by Israel against Gaza and revelations about how the Zionist lobby freely and repeatedly interferes in the politics of the West.

But always remember that any views from Fuentes -- good, bad or indifferent -- ultimately stem from a nebulous and inchoate desire to "groom" young men towards the "dark side" of his own unacknowledged and confused sexuality.

In the past this has also led him to turn a blind eye to such behaviour in its more explicit forms, as we see with his repeated excuses for his "Stop the Steal" associate Ali Alexander


___________________________________


Colin Liddell is the Chief Editor of Neokrat and the author of Interviews & Obituaries, a collection of encounters with the dead and the famous. Support his work by buying his book here (USA), here (UK), and here (Australia), or by taking out a paid subscription on his Substack.

Follow on Twitter and Bluesky

Tuesday, November 11, 2025

STRANGE GOINGS-ON IN THE LABOUR PARTY



Novara Media is a "heavily left-coded" channel that seeks to undermine British establishment politics. Regardless of their possible nefarious motives and funding, they provide an interesting critique of the crisis in the Labour Party and the project to control it through Israeli-linked money and accusations of "anti-Semitism." Here they speak to Paul Holden, a South African journalist, who has just published a book on how the unpopular Keir Starmer was "astroturfed" into becoming leader. Also discussed is why Shabana Mahmood, the new Home Secretary, is being groomed to become his successor. 

Saturday, November 8, 2025

THE FUTURE OF BRITAIN



The main role of predictions is not to predict the future, which tends to be practically impossible, but instead to perceive the present and sketch out some looming possibilities. With that understood -- and not too much credibility on the line -- let us proceed. 

In the UK, the future looks pretty cut-and-dried. Nigel Farage's Reform UK Party has what looks like an insurmountable lead in the polls and looks certain to become Prime Minister in a few years time...but (or rather several buts).

Farage and Reform UK have their own organic base, essentially normal Brits pissed off with the many failings caused by liberal multiculturalism. But it is also clear that they are benefitting from international factors, especially the impact of Kremlin ops on the UK and the high water mark of Trumpism in the USA.

The thing is that both of these factors are highly volatile and unstable. The recent elections in the US, in which the Dems trounced the Republicans in New York and a couple of states, exposed the limitations of Trumpism. It's a good bet that Trump will now increasingly look like a badly-aging lame duck; and without Trump, Trumpism simply won't work.

There is no one who can take over the mantle -- Vance has zero charisma and lacks likeability, as do Trump's kids. We are likely to see something like a Cruz or a Rubio move up as a replacement. That might still be good enough to keep the Dems in check, but if it doesn't, the whole MAGA project is likely to splinter and collapse, to be replaced by a triumphant Democrat reaction that will probably jail a fair number of MAGA people (Trump himself, Bannon, Stephen Miller, etc).

At the very least, MAGA is going to be a lot weaker going forward. Likewise with Russia. The long-expected Russian collapse may never happen, but there is a growing chance that it could, and may even be only a few weeks away! Suffice to say that if and when it happens, no one will be the least bit surprised that it did.

With a diminished or discredited MAGA and a collapsing Kremlin, Farage's prospects will of course dim, but there is still enough raw resentment and cynicism aimed at the old parties for Reform to pull it off. Much will therefore depend on how the establishment attacks Farage and how dirty they are prepared to get.


Much will also depend on whether the Tories can mimic Reform talking points enough to (a) completely steal their thunder and unite Right-wing voters into a landslide victory, or (b) divide the right-wing vote enough to give Labour another chance. 

Key to this will be whether "they" can get rid of Kemi Badenoch as Tory leader, as having a Nigerian anchor baby as leader of a rightward-moving, tough-on-immigration Tory Party is simply a non-starter. But even if Badenoch can be ousted, it is clear that the Tories will still struggle to find the right leader who can unite their party around a platform attractive to the 30-35% of voters who are currently leaning to Reform. At the moment, Robert Jenrick looks like the most likely Badenoch successor, although he remains somewhat charisma-deficient.

Then, assuming Reform, or a Reform-channelling Tory Party, win, it is not at all clear what will happen. Presumably whichever one succeeds will scrap the European Court of Human Rights and start making Britain a lot less attractive to illegal migrants. That would be something. However, due to the UK's lower-than-replacement fertility rate, pressure will remain to continue mass immigration at least at the level needed to counter that.

But the other problem the UK has is the so-called Left-leaning Celtic fringe. If English voters put in a "hard Right" or "harder Right" party, then that will increase the pressure for Scotland and Wales to break away, which could get messy pretty fast. It may sound odd to say this, but the Labour Party is the de facto "Unionist Party" in the present day. And this is no minor point, as the UK simply wouldn't work without Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland, reducing England to petty state.  

But we also live in fast-changing times, so there is also  a reasonable possibility that politics could be swept aside by technology.

Developments in crypto, AI, and robots are moving along at a tremendous pace, although most of this seems to be happening in the US and China. However, a Britain in which self-driving vehicles are ubiquitous won't need so many Third World Deliveroo men; and there is even the possibility that within a decade Third-world-sourced NHS nurses and home helps will be facing stiff competition from AI-driven robots.

As I keep hearing myself saying recently, "What a time to be alive!"

___________________________________


Colin Liddell is the Chief Editor of Neokrat and the author of Interviews & Obituaries, a collection of encounters with the dead and the famous. Support his work by buying his book here (USA), here (UK), and here (Australia), or by taking out a paid subscription on his Substack.

Follow on Twitter and Bluesky

Tuesday, November 4, 2025

SLAVERING ISLAMO-COMMUNIST NUTJOB ELECTED MAYOR OF NEW YORK

Mamdani, the face of evil

Zohran Mamdani, a
 manically-grinning psychopath who hates America and believes in insane Communist ideas that have been behind several major famines in the 20th century, has been elected mayor of New York City.

The sick, bearded fanatic, who is a Muslim of South Indian ancestry who once lived in Ugnada, won 52% of the vote, trouncing his rivals, fake independent Andrew Cuomo (29%) and Republican 'Guardian Angel' "spoiler" candidate Curtis Sliwa (17%). 

It is not yet clear why New Yorkers decided to vote for a mayor whose insane Trotskyist policies will drive all rich people out of the city and cause mass poverty and rampant crime, but one theory is that they did this to "get back" at Donald Trump for being such a prick.

Another is that social media was hacked by "outside actors" to boost this crazed wacko and cause chaos, division, and economic illiteracy in the West.

Another is that non-Jewish voters in the city (91%) did it to piss off the city's Jews (9%), which is, technically speaking, passive-aggressive "anti-Semitism." 



Mamdani will now join his fellow Indian Muslim Leftist kook, London's Sadiq Khan, in presiding over the ruin and demise of a once great Western city, turning it into a cratered, graffiti-smeared hell-hole, populated by orcs and zombies.

London today, New York tomorrow

THE DEATH AND MEANING OF DICK CHENEY



Dick Cheney, it seems, has passed away. Suffice to say, I was never a fan.

When he was "Vice" President of the USA ( 2001-09), the word "vice" clearly had two meanings, as one of the things I remember about him was an aura of apparent "evilness." Whether it was really there or not, he kind of amplified it with his characteristic lop-sided grimace that always put me in mind of a stroke victim.

Cheney will be remembered mainly as the premier Neocon in an age that has now, thanks to Trumpian "mad man" transcendence, made all the debates, battlelines, and moral values of that former age seem totally redundant. Whether this remains the case is an open question.

What then was the essence of that movement and of Cheney, its leading manifestation (as no one thinks George W Bush was calling the shots)?

To my mind the Neocons (and Cheney) were an odd amalgam of cynicism and idealism. Cynical, because they clearly believed that the ends justified the means and that the means involved blatantly lying to the American people; and idealistic because they believed in the naïve idea that large chunks of the Middle East could, in the wake of the 9-11 attacks, be invaded and made into burger-chomping democracies, fully plugged into the international "rules based" liberal capitalist system.  Post-war Germany and Japan were the models apparently.

From the vantage point of 2025, this all seems terribly naïve, while there are many who would even doubt they sincerely believed in such a project. But was it really nonsense? More on that later.

Regarding the idea of whether Cheney believed in his declared goals of democratising the Middle East, the enormous cost and persistence that the Bush administration put into the effort suggests that he did.

Cheney cynics tend to believe that this was just a cover for his "real agenda," namely to destabilize the Middle East and kill a lot of Muslims. But those goals could have been achieved at a fraction of the cost, so I am going side with the idea that Cheney and co. were sincere in their "nation building" schtick, and were probably devastated and puzzled when it didn't work out.

But why didn't it work out? Of course, there are many who believe that the Middle East can't be stabilized or democratised and, on the whole, I tend to side with them, but my 'minority opinion' is that the whole Neocon project -- and indeed any move to bring sanity to the Middle East -- was and is undercut by that other big thing that characterised the Neocons, namely their excessive deference to the State of Israel and Zionism. 

In the case of Gaza and Palestine, Hamas was called into being (and even funded) by the existence of an Israeli State backed to the hilt by the Neocon movement in the US.

Is this not also true of ISIS and other Middle Easters "deplorables"?  

The great irony of Cheney and the Neocons is that they might have succeeded in their greater goal of democratisation if they hadn't sunk so much of their ideological capital into worshipping the Golden Calf of a toxically Zionist Israeli state. 


___________________________________


Colin Liddell is the Chief Editor of Neokrat and the author of Interviews & Obituaries, a collection of encounters with the dead and the famous. Support his work by buying his book here (USA), here (UK), and here (Australia), or by taking out a paid subscription on his Substack.

Follow on Twitter and Bluesky

Monday, October 27, 2025

IN DESPERATE ATTEMPT TO AVOID U.S. TARIFFS, JAPAN ROLLS OUT RED CARPET FOR COGNITIVELY-DECLINING ORANGE BABOON

Tokyo's beautiful dull grey aesthetic marred by the garish colours of the tacky American flag

In one of the most perplexing displays of diplomacy since the Vichy French thanked Hitler for making their trains run on time, Japan has rolled out the red carpet for a large orange baboon in terminal cognitive decline.

In honour of the amber creature, the entire city of Tokyo was lit up in Red, White, and Blue (the American colours), although in a careless oversight by the Japanese Ministry of the Interior, no orange included in the subservient light show.

The tangerine thing, which is now American President thanks to a practical joke played on political elites by US voters, was then greeted by the Japanese Emperor at the Imperial Palace. However, the grunting marmalade blob was clearly unable to remember the Emperor's name or even the word "Emperor" and had to constantly point at the 126th occupant of the Chrysanthemum Throne when referring to him. 


Later, the orange orangutan met the Prime Minister whom the Japanese had specially selected to please him, Sanae Takaichi, a protégé of former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. 

Here too he exposed his disintegrating intelligence, referring to his host merely as "this woman" instead of by her name or titles:


This unprecedented show of deference and humiliation of one nation to another is motivated by Japan's desire to avoid American tariffs, as the Japanese economy, which once dominated the globe, has been in a sharp decline over recent years -- paralleling that of the America President's own plummeting IQ and basic awareness of reality.

Japanese government insiders believe that such pathetic kow-towing is the only option, because if America pulled the plug, Japan would have no option left but to become a satellite of Communist China.

THE SPITEFUL QUEENS OF THE ALT-RIGHT



One of the defining characteristics of the political right in the 2020s is its seething, burning hatred of women. In fact, it is such a dominant streak in the muddled mass that can charitably be called "right wing political thought" that it supersedes almost all other tenets. Indeed, you can be black, brown, yellow, Jewish, you can be a crypto scammer, a traitor, a paedophile, you can even believe in a multiracial right-wing utopia, as long as you tick the all-important box of hating women. It is the Shibboleth of the Alt-Right.

Now, this may seem somewhat contradictory to a movement which purports to be concerned about declining birth rates, in which case all I can really say is "welcome to right-wing politics," where every deeply held, essential belief directly and flagrantly contradicts every other deeply held, essential belief. That is, of course, unless you factor in the all-important catalyst for male-female relations in the right wing mind, which is rape. The plan isn’t to seduce the women, but to subjugate them, bind them in economic (or if necessary literal) chains and rape them into glorious, birthrate-boosting pregnancies. 

We can address the right-wing obsession with rape some other time. For now, I’d like to point out something that we used to know in the world before online disinformation poisoned the culture and discourse. Seething, burning hatred used to be a characteristic of one very particular, very queer group of men. In those halcyon days, we called them homosexuals.

It may seem strange to people that gay men should hate women. It is rather counterintuitive. Why should a group of men uninterested in women have any sort of hatred for women? Maybe it’s because women steal all the hot men away, but if a woman could steal your man away, he was never really yours to begin with. 

The truth is that gay men resent women because of what women have: the attention of men and the equipment necessary to have sex with them.

Let’s face facts here: anal sex doesn’t exactly come naturally to human beings. The nature of the parts involved, the lack of flexibility that the anus has (relative to the vagina, obviously), the lack of natural lubrication, and of course, the ever-present bodily waste product, for which it was designed, make it a suboptimal sexual experience; especially when compared to good old-fashioned hetero-rogering. Indeed, the checklist of all the steps necessary to safely have anal sex would put the average nuclear reactor to shame. If you’re a heterosexual, it’s not worth the bother. 


At the heart of every gay man’s being is the desire to be taken and roughly rogered by burly men like the delicate princess he is. Unfortunately, the realities of what men are and the nature of the mechanics involved mean that if anyone is going to get the old 'in-and-out' good and hard, it’s going to be the people who are attractive to burly men and have the requisite receptacle, i.e. women. 

Right-wingers tend to have a limited awareness of this. Living as they do in suburban and exurban locales, they don’t, as a general rule, have the opportunity to study gay men "in the wild," so to speak. They haven’t witnessed the spectacle of a despondent, drunk homosexual angrily shaking his fist at the heavens, cursing God because he doesn’t have a pussy. It is quite natural for homosexuals to grow deeply resentful of women, who have what they’ll never have. 

Now, that is all what it is, but what relevance does it have to the broader right-wing hatred of women? Dear reader, surely you jest. Surely you have noticed that the old Alt-Right, and the new Dissident Right, and the ever-newsworthy National Populist Right were heavily "manned" with homosexuals. Nonsense, you say! Surely such luminaries of 'back-door action' as Jack Donovan, Costin Alamariu (aka Bronze Age Pervert), Nick Fuentes, Milo Yiannopoulos, or even America’s favourite, couch-molesting closet queen JD Vance have not let their homosexual resentment of women define their rabidly woman-hating ideology! Obviously these individuals have not allowed their own hang-ups about women to infect the minds of their young, impressionable followers. 

Indeed, the danger of homosexual leaders to the Alt-Right was always framed as the potential danger of using their authority to pressure young men into having sex with them. The thought of Greg Johnson (I refer to him as someone will inevitably bring him up, although, to his credit, he avoids the default woman hatred) running bathhouse retreats to seduce young lads haunts lots of people’s nightmares, however, this scenario was never much of a serious risk. It is actually very difficult, if not impossible, to argue or pressure a heterosexual man into accepting anal intercourse, and if force or drugs are used, well then that becomes a matter for the police. The much greater danger was always in allowing spiteful queens to imbue young minds with their own hang-ups about sexuality and especially women.

We live in a time when relations between men and women are increasingly fraught and increasingly politicised. This is an unalloyed bad and needs to be addressed soberly and rationally. The last thing we need is for frustrated right-wing gay men to pollute the discourse with their resentment of women, and we especially don’t need them to whisper into the ears of impressionable young men who struggle with dating and relationships.

For this reason, I advise all young men who’re looking for love and female companionship to distance themselves from right wing discourse and its weaponised homosexualism as much as they can.

Friday, October 24, 2025

THE STRANGENESS OF THE NEW JAPANESE PRIME MINISTER


Japan has a new plan to stop Trump's tariffs


The point of knowing things and being smart is not to just know things and be smart, it is to use that intelligence to infer things that you don't definitely know. So it is with politics. Sticking just to the known facts is dull, pointless, and all too obvious. What we can 'know' beyond what we can absolutely prove is the point. 

In the case of the new Japanese Prime Minister, however, there are not only facts to build on, there are also "anti-facts," which I would describe as things that have happened that shouldn't have happened and things that should have happened that failed to happen. 

Anti-facts are there whenever you feel something isn't quite right, and with the rise of Sanae Takaichi to the Prime Ministership of Japan things feel distinctly odd. 

First of all, Japan is a little bit like Russia in that most of the population is relatively depoliticised and uninterested in politics. There is a lack of emotional energy in Japanese "democracy," allowing hidden elites to control things.

The difference from Russia, however, is that those elites are big business and the major Japanese companies, rather than the siloviki and their placemen. The
 approach of the Japanese elites to politics is determined not by what's good for the Japanese people, of course, but by what's good for Japan Inc. and themselves. 

With this in mind, the rather unexpected rise to power of Takaichi is totally queer, as she cuts directly across the interests of Japan Inc. The two most obvious ways in which she does this are: 

  1. She ruffles the feathers of the Chinese and the Koreans with her performative Japanese ultranationalism. Japan Inc. reaps enormous benefits from positive business ties to China, and no major Japanese corporation can easily cut the Chinese out of its supply chains. 
  2. She makes Japan's increasing reliance on imported labour much more difficult. Japan Inc. is now addicted to the drug of ever-increasing migrant labour. In fact, the previous PM and LDP leader, Shigeru Ishiba was even talking about creating African-friendly cities in Japan. 

So, to sum up, Japan Inc., which essentially controls Japanese politics, allowed or even assisted Takaichi in becoming PM. Yes, the logic is well off line here, suggesting additional facts and hidden factors.

Following the resignation of Shigeru Ishiba in September, the natural choice for PM would have been Shinjirō Koizumi, whose ascent looked at one time as all but inevitable.

The most likely explanation is that this did not happen because strings were pulled by hidden hands. But why put Takaichi in? 

The answer would need to be one that made sense to Japan Inc. The only real benefit to them of a Takaichi prime ministership is that she would reduce the threat of tariffs, which has been the main obsession of Japanese elites since November last year.

Takaichi is regarded in Japan as the major politician who is most simpatico to Donald Trump. This is because she is seen as the "political daughter" of Trump's former close ally Shinzo Abe, and her "Japan first" populist schtick is a sort of 'tribute act' to MAGA.

It does not seem unlikely, therefore, that the hands that pull the strings in Tokyo decided to interrupt their default Sinophilia and love of mass immigration to put in a J-MAGA populist for a few months in order to blow smoke up Trump's ass and stave off some tariffs.

The elites in Japan follow American politics almost as closely as they follow their own politics, and they fully expect Trump to be a spent force within little over a year. Takaichi may be intended as a safety stopgap to cover this dangerous period.

___________________________________


Colin Liddell is the Chief Editor of Neokrat and the author of Interviews & Obituaries, a collection of encounters with the dead and the famous. Support his work by buying his book here (USA), here (UK), and here (Australia), or by taking out a paid subscription on his Substack.

Follow on Twitter and Bluesky

Sunday, October 19, 2025

TRUMP DUMPS SHIT ON AMERICAN PEOPLE IN NEW LOW FOR U.S. PRESIDENCY

Still from the video showing "King Trump" pooping on his people

In a new low for a joke country made by religious lunatics and petty criminals deported from Europe in the 18th century, its latest low-quality President has released a video on social media in which he flies over his people in a jet fighter and drops huge, unending amounts of poops on them. 

This is not the first time the country, sometimes referred to as "America" after a cartological error in an old map, has completely disgraced itself.

Typical "heritage American" praying to his primitive snake gods

Back in 1812, soon after it was granted independence by its British masters, it got its ass kicked when it tried to invade its uninhabited neighbour Canada.

At the time, America had a population of 
7,239,881, compared to Canada's 500,000 (mainly eskimos and caribou), but still lost. This is believed to be the first time in history that a populated country was defeated in a war by an unpopulated one.

America then preceded to attract every nutjob in Europe for the next hundred years, becoming ever more dysfunctionally multicultural and plain weird. 

Europe did not send its best: US immigrant from the 1840s 

As Americans became increasingly "mis-bred" and odd-looking their political system deteriorated into a clown circus that produced ever more idiotic, vulgar, and inferior leaders.

In 1933, they elected some freak in wheelchair, closely followed by a
 sex predator with a drug problem who tried to start a nuclear war with the tiny island of Cuba, then a senile movie actor famous for co-starring to a chimp. 

One of these guys would actually have made a relatively decent President

I won't bore you with all the other shit-tier losers who got to be President simply by floating to the top of the giant human cesspool that is the United States, except to say that Trump is clearly the worst of the lot and shows it in every waking moment, word, and act that emanates from him like steam off a turd. 

His latest social media post is just the shining cherry on top of the great big mountain of shit that has been accumulating and marinading in the North American continent for the last 300 years. 


Friday, October 17, 2025

MORGOTH AND THE WANK-CRYING CRYBABY CULT (REPOST)


Wyvern the Terrible identifies the "wank-crying" cult promoted by Alt-Right "luminary" Morgoth, as he luxuriates in the impotent tears of his pathetic following of cry babies, driven to tears by his maudlin, "poor wittle wypipo" content.


Originally posted here 24th Feb, 2024. Rumble version reposted following the recent deletion of Wyvern's YouTube channel.

Monday, October 13, 2025

TRUMP'S FAKE PEACE DEAL HAS NO LEGS

America likes to revisit its moments of naïve euphoria 


Peace is the continuation of war by other means, as Clausewitz might have said.

Anyone taking this Gaza peace deal at all seriously has clearly not looked at the details of the deal and has a net negative understanding of the Middle East. So, can we all stop pretending that Donald Trump is some genius peace deal maker. 

The first stage -- basically stop genociding the Palestinians, releasing 2000 randomly arrested "Hamas terrorists," and returning a few living Israeli hostages and body parts, is the easy part.

This leaves the Israeli's in charge of a depopulated part of Gaza (in yellow on the map), meanwhile a minimum of 600 trucks per day are bring in food, water, medicine, tents, and equipment for rubble removal, etc. without interference from Israel. Meanwhile attempts will be mad to re-establish hospitals, bakeries, and basic water, electricity, and sewage systems.


After the big sugar rush of humanitarian joy this brings, however, things get very shitty very quickly.

The next part of the deal is the "Hamas Disarmament and Amnesty" part. Hamas are expected to decommission their weapons and commit to peaceful coexistence, with Gaza being declared a "de-radicalized, terror-free zone" posing no threat to neighbours. 

On paper is one thing, in reality is quite another, but here the two sides are not even in alignment on paper, with Israel insisting on "full demilitarization," while Hamas seeks "guarantees against re-occupation." Also, how does full demilitarization even happen without an occupying force to back it up and impose it?

It simply isn't going to happen, while among the 600 or more trucks a day bringing stuff into Gaza at least one or two of them are going to be bringing in weapons. 

Then there is the "Governance and Transitional Authority" part of the plan, which stipulates temporary rule by a "technocratic, apolitical Palestinian committee of qualified locals and international experts" with "oversight" by a "Board of Peace" chaired by Trump and including figures like former UK PM Tony Blair.

Yeh, oversight. What do they do when they see something they don't like?

The answer is fuck all. All its monitoring is non-invasive and relies on cooperation from Hamas. Observers cannot even enter Hamas-controlled areas without prior consent. When push comes to shove, the Board of Peace will be able to recommend targeted sanctions (e.g., financial freezes, travel bans, etc.) on Hamas leaders and suspend aid flows temporarily. Effectively toothless.

Hamas will probably play nice for a bit in order to rebuild their "human infrastructure," i.e. the physical wellbeing of the young angry population of Gaza (the ever fertile soil for their seed) and hang on until full Israeli withdrawal from Gaza by December 31. After that Hamas will resume full control and start being Hamas again, while in response Israel will continue its favourite tactic of occasional strikes on whoever their intelligence tells them is running Gaza. Hamas will then lauch attacks as usual in "retaliation."

Phase three of the peace deal, namely international funding for Gaza redevelopment (the "Trump Riviera" concept), and the "pathway to Palestinian self-determination/statehood" are unlikely to materialise, and my guess is that both Hamas and Israel kind of like it that way.

The world meanwhile will continue to send in billions in aid to keep the most crappy geopolitical bum-fight in existence going.

___________________________________


Colin Liddell is the Chief Editor of Neokrat and the author of Interviews & Obituaries, a collection of encounters with the dead and the famous. Support his work by buying his book here (USA), here (UK), and here (Australia), or by taking out a paid subscription on his Substack.

Follow on Twitter and Bluesky