Pages

Pages

Sunday, July 31, 2022

ENGLAND BECOME "GIRLYBALL CHAMPIONS," NATION FORCED TO CELEBRATE

The first one to stop cheering will be shot

Millions of innocent English people have been brutally forced to "celebrate" the nation's Girlyball team winning the Euro Championship.

Girlyball has been compared to men's football, but it is more like girl's hockey without hockey sticks and a slightly bigger ball. 

Although no one is the least bit interested in the high-pitched, low-powered sport, the UK government has decreed that everyone within the borders of the UK must celebrate the obscure sporting triumph before midnight or face death.

This has led to non-stop broadcasts on the state-run BBC  reminiscent of Soviet or North Korean propaganda, with glassy-eyed presenters extolling the "achievements" of the nation's Girlyball Team. Other coercive measures include threatening the nation with Liz "Grotbags" Truss as Prime Minister if they don't comply.

Armed checkpoints have reportedly been set up around the nation's capital city London and other major cities, where jackbooted Thought Police monitor why people are getting "shitfaced." Failure to say things like "I'm getting shitfaced because of our girls" or "Girlyball Macht Frei" may result in an altered social credit score or a shallow grave.

TOMMY ROBINSON AND THE EXPLOITATION OF ENGLISH SOCIAL AND MORAL DYSFUNCTION


YouTuber and Rochdale resident John Collins argues that "Islamophobes" like Tommy Robinson exploit long-running social and moral dysfunction in Northern English towns by exclusively blaming Muslims for the sexual behaviour of lower class, underage White girls. Collins argues that the grooming epidemic has roots in the wider society, and that blaming Muslims for it merely reinforces their support for the Labour Party.

Friday, July 29, 2022

THE ALT-RIGHT IN THE NETHERLANDS: HOW ERKENBRAND PREPARES FOR THE STRUGGLE FOR A WHITE NATION

Fausto Lanser, known as Faust

Note: This is an article from the Dutch newspaper De Volkskrant, described by Wikipedia as a "centre-left Catholic broadsheet." It is about the Dutch Alt-Right in 2017 when the establishment was in "panic mode." Of course it is attempting to portray the Dutch Alt-Right in as negative a light as possible, but it can't avoid presenting us with certain facts and insights that are valid. As the paper is paywalled, this article is auto-translated from an archived version here. Writer: Annieke Kranenberg, 19th November 2017 

___________________________________


Erkenbrand and the white man's rebellion


With wide arm gestures Fausto, a young man in a suit in his mid-twenties, thanks the audience in a conference room in a Rotterdam hotel. About 80 to 90 percent of the attendees are Dutch, he continues in flexible English. But there are also Italians, Germans, Hungarians, Americans, British, Finns and Greeks. "There are 240 people," says Fausto, who, as usual, wears a pin of the Dutch flag on his lapel. 'That's almost double the number of the conference last year.'


Via the livestream of the conference, provided by the far-right association Suomen Sisu from Finland, a loud applause is heard. Beaming, Fausto walks away from the camera, the only face of the organization that is recognizably portrayed.


It is 14 October 2017 and the very young study society Erkenbrand celebrates the success of its second conference with the title 'Towards a new Golden Age'. American author Jared Taylor, who calls himself not a racist but a "race realist," has just answered the last question from a young man from Germany. "You woke me up about the theme of race," says the German. 'When will the moment come when, for the first time, a European politician can speak as freely as you can?'


"That's absolutely necessary," replies Taylor, a calm sixties with a professorial appearance, whose popular videos about racial differences have been blocked on YouTube for several months. But, Taylor continues to the German questioner, as long as people react angrily and dismayed to talk about race, it may be wiser to achieve the goal through a nationalist discourse. 'We always have to adapt our discourse to our audience.' Controlled: 'But in the end, in the end, the brotherhood of Europe will have to talk about the biology that underlies our civilization.' And then a little louder: "I'm sure some of the young people among you will be elected electorally and can name these things as explicitly as we've said them here today."


The discharge is almost tangible: here you can say what you think. Not anonymously and online, but physically, face to face. Or as an Erkenbrand visitor later puts it to the Volkskrant: 'You notice that people want to crawl together to be able to say what they want.'


A Pim Fortuyn-like energy crackles through the room, although the hard core of Erkenbrand had only just reached puberty when the politician was murdered in 2002 and it would take years before the term Alt-Right would blow over to the Netherlands with the rise of Donald Trump. As in the United States, the right-wing alternative scene in Europe consists of a broad, loose-knit bandage of ultraconservatives, fundamentalist Christians, libertarians, esoteric dissenters, conspiracy theorists, right-wing radicals, racists and anti-Semites. A number of beliefs are common: they stand up for the preservation of a 'white' Europe (one emphatically emphasizes culture, the other emphatically on race), they are against immigration, Islam, cultural Marxism, oikophobia and they are strongly anti-feminist.


Many expect that populations will sooner or later face each other, some are already preparing for a violent confrontation. This is also the case with Erkenbrand, although the addition of the study society may suggest otherwise.

AIVD calls Erkenbrand 'striking'


Erkenbrand - an old Dutch name meaning 'holy sword' or 'pure flame' - is the most important representative of the alt-right in the Netherlands. Last September, the hitherto unknown study society held its first conference and immediately attracted a hundred carefully selected visitors.


'I was surprised by that', says Willem Wagenaar of the Anne Frank House, which researches the extreme right in the Netherlands. Not only the number of visitors surprised him - classic far-right organizations often mess around with banners in the margins - but also the level of education. The core consists of about 25 mainly young people. 'Smart young men and a single woman who are attracted to an ideology that, by Dutch standards, is unadulterated racist and anti-Semitic.'


In April, the AIVD [General Intelligence and Security Service] also called the creation of Erkenbrand, a 'xenophobic nationalist group', 'striking'. 'For the first time in decades, an extreme right-wing group is active in the Netherlands of which a large number of sympathizers are highly educated.'


Since then, Erkenbrand seems to have only grown, as evidenced by the turnout at the last conference and their stature within the international alt-right world. The society produces an improbable amount of ideas and beliefs. They fill dozens of hours of podcasts (Radio Evropa) about 'race and realism' and about 'the beginning of the uprising' in the American town of Charlottesville where last August it came to a deadly clash between anti-fascists and right-wing extremists. On the site appear long epistles about Forum for Democracy - 'the only bright spot' in the last elections - and about 'the blood red colour of the antifacists'. Their productions are widely distributed by other alt-right media. In the meantime, Erkenbranders are steadily building a social network, organizing monthly drinks, forest walks and combat training.


This raises the question of what Erkenbrand stands for. Is social resistance to the far right - in the capacity of the alt-right - crumbling? What is the breeding ground? Is the society just a fashionable regurgitation or a radical trailblazer? And who are the people behind it, what do they want to achieve - and how?


It is not easy to identify Erkenbranders and to get in touch with them (some of them do). The society manages to operate quite secretly. If you want to visit a meeting, you have to go through a strict ballotage. First sign up and pay (27.50 euros for the last conference), then answer questions about race and gender by e-mail, and sometimes there is also a live conversation. Like-minded people are not just admitted; one was refused because Erkenbranders discovered on Facebook that he has a dark girlfriend. Conference attendees will only be told where the event is taking place at the last minute via a group app from Telegram.


Almost everyone is alert to unmasking. Most Erkenbranders hide behind pseudonyms on social media. On videos, they appear wearing sunglasses and masks.


The main internet spot for Erkenbrand has always been the rough discussion platform 4chan - just like for the alt-right scene in the US - but for several months they have been stuck in the much more shielded world of Discord, a chat program that is popular with left- and right-wing extremist groups. Here, too, there is a ballot, in which the alt-right ideas are tested (are you for or against 'transgenders'?). De Volkskrant managed to gain access by filling in the desired answers and was able to watch, but did not participate in the discussions.


In this unseen world, they devise strategies to spread their ideology and defy their enemies - 'social justice warriors'. The atmosphere here is grimmer than on 4chan, where people regularly remind each other that the AIVD might be watching or that anti-fascists are 'infiltrating' the forum. Discord speaks more openly about the use of violence and weapons.


Fausto, who studied history and economics, is one of the few who publicly claims to be an Honorary Burner. In many places he simply uses his first name, sometimes abbreviated to Faust, and he comes to the fore without hesitation in several videos. In videos, for example, he leads the popular Scottish alt-right vlogger Millennial Woes ('millennium misery') around the Schilderswijk in The Hague (to show the 'Islamization' of the Netherlands) and the Amsterdam red light district (to outline the moral decay).


Fausto - his last name is known to the editors - is not waiting to explain his ideas in more detail in the Volkskrant. 'How did you get my number?', he asks agitatedly when we contact us via WhatsApp. 'Any publication you make about me is still collaboration (sic) without my permission. Any damage experienced will be recovered by my lawyer on the Volkskrant.' If we approach him again this week, it turns out that he has taken a different number. He also does not respond to his e-mail, in which we ask him to be heard again. On the private chat channel Discord we have come across serious statements. Fausto boasts about gun ownership and threats of violence - more on that later.

Red pill


Fausto was not always preoccupied with Muslims and race. He grew up in a progressive nest, lived for years with his mother and brother in Portugal. On his return to the Netherlands, he got his 'red pill' moment when he accompanied boys of Moroccan origin in Rotterdam-Noord as a community centre worker. In alt-right circles, everyone has their own red pill story, named after the red pill from the movie The Matrix that makes you wake up and see 'the truth'. In Fausto's case, that was the truth about the problematic sides of the multicultural society.


The first time Fausto speaks publicly about his "awakening" happens some time before he fully converts to the alt-right. In October 2015 Fausto is a guest in the TV program Studio PowNed where the popularity of the PVV among the chic VVD electorate in Wassenaar is discussed. Guests are political scientist Meindert Fennema, journalist Annabel Nanninga and Fausto's later political hero Thierry Baudet. Fausto is presented as a highly educated young person who made the jump from D66 to the PVV. After congratulating Baudet on his EU-critical book Attack on the Nation-State, Fausto recounts how his community work in a black neighborhood tilted his opinion on integration.


Two years later, when Fausto says he has worked his way up to become 'erkenbrand's second man', he speaks in an alt-right podcast in sharper terms about his 'red pill'. "It was hopeless. Moroccans are the most terrible people here.'


The shift from D66 to the PVV and then to the 'racially realistic' articles of faith of Erkenbrand takes place in stages. In several podcasts Fausto describes his political quest in 2015 that leads him to the 'politically incorrect' discussion group /pol/ on 4chan. There he tries to encourage people to take action against the refugee crisis that is reaching a peak at that moment. Fausto himself visits some of Pegida's street demonstrations. But street activism doesn't suit him. 'Plebs', he calls the Pegida members in an Erkenbrand podcast.


Fausto desires more intellectual depth. He finds them, among other things, with the Scotsman Millennial Woes - real name Colin Robertson - a shrewd art student in his mid-thirties who has been keeping a vlog about white ethnonationalism since 2013. In recent years, Woes has developed into an important player in the alt-right scene, a leader for young people who have their origins in multiculturalism and mainstream politics, but want to stay away from the uncultivated types of classical right-wing extremism. In one of Woes' vlogs from July 2016, links are made to erkenbrand's site. Fausto seeks direct contact.

White supremacy


Erkenbrand is then just under construction. Spiritual fathers are two students: Bart (a pseudonym) and Michael (real name). In a number of alt-right media, Bart and Michael say that they met on Twitter through a mutual friend. They share the same unease about multiculturalism, the refugee crisis and politics. There needs to be change, they think, but that can only happen by doing "more" than just online activism. Erkenbrand must become a platform that spreads knowledge about white supremacy and forges a highly educated cadre with real political capital.


They actively scour the net in search of kindred spirits. In June 2016, 'Bart' calls himself 'the chairman of Erkenbrand' when he contacts the head of 'meadhall', a right-wing extremist group that is active online on 8chan - also known as the most fiery place online. But they also meet physically. 'Perhaps it is an idea to join forces', he suggests. The response has been positive. Several visitors make plans to visit the Erkenbrand meetings.


Behind 'Bart' is actually Milan. Milan, who studied European Studies at the University of Applied Sciences in The Hague, was 'rescued' at a young age, he says in an interview he gave with Michael at the alt-right station Red Ice in September 2016. His class consisted of 'more than 50 percent foreigners'. He remembers very well how 'they' reacted when Theo van Gogh was 'slaughtered in the middle of the street'. "He asked for it, they said. Unbelievable. That they could be so different. Like a fifth column.'


Before Milan founded Erkenbrand, he published on the site curiales.nl, where pieces carry titles such as 'Why women are destroying Western civilization (and other uncomfortable truths)'. He also writes under a pseudonym for the site American Renaissance of 'race realist' Jared Taylor. It is striking that in 2016, as a college student, he appears among professors such as Paul Cliteur and Erik Jurgens in the yearbook Colonialism and Racism by Civis Mundi (journal for political philosophy and culture). The compiler can no longer remember how Milan became involved in the collection.


Even after the founding of Erkenbrand, Milan continues to write. Earlier this year, from February to June, he did an internship at Elsevier Weekblad. In that period, on February 11, an extensive piece about Erkenbrand appeared in the weekly, in which it is stated that the two founders were also spoken to. "Milan was not one of them," says the Elsevier journalist. She says that she only found out later that their intern was a Badge of Honor. The editor-in-chief had a conversation with him, but he was not out of place. 'There was nothing strange about his pieces.'


When we email Milan and approach him via Facebook, he doesn't respond. Erkenbrand's alleged 'number one' does not want to be found, according to his efforts to erase online traces. For example, on the last day of his internship, he removed his photo from the site and deleted parts of his biography, says the Elsevier journalist.


Just like Milan, Michael is also recognized by several visitors as one of the founders of Erkenbrand, but Michael also does not respond to requests from the Volkskrant to talk. In the aforementioned Red Ice interview, Michael says that he experienced his 'red pill' in the murder of Pim Fortuyn. Despite his sexual orientation, which does not correspond to the alt-right focus on traditional gender roles, a striking number of Erkenbranders speak with praise about Fortuyn's pioneering role. Michael says in the interview that he mainly believes in raising awareness. Everyone needs a red pill.

Neo-Nazis


Erkenbranders should have little of skinheads, according to various discussions online. They think they are stupid, they give white nationalism a bad name. 'We expect a certain intellectual level from our participants', the Erkenbranders write on their site. 'However, a study at university or college is not required.'


That does not alter the fact that classic neo-Nazis also appear in their ranks and that some Erkenbranders develop into pure anti-Semites. Fausto now describes himself unequivocally as a Nazi, who spreads Nazi pictures and symbols. "You can call me a Nazi, that's me," Fausto wrote at the end of October under the Twitter @BorislavBolgar. In a podcast of November 18 last year, Fausto responds to the "Jewish question" with the words: "I will not shed a tear if the train to the East is restarted."


Other Erkenbranders have a longer track record in Nazi and fascist ideas, such as the Brabant twenty-something Quincy (known online as Othala). In the past he was part of Zwart Front, a fascist splinter group that draws its inspiration from the eponymous fascist Black Front of the thirties.


A fixation on "true masculinity" is at the heart of Quincy's worldview. The most important pillar in this is the glorification of physical culture. Together with the boys of his martial arts club Stormram - also webshop - he wants to stop 'the feminization of the western man'. Battering ram is also the strong arm of Erkenbrand. At conferences, Quincy's security team ensures that no photos of the audience are taken and that uninvited guests are shown the door.


Quincy, who does not want to respond to the newspaper's findings, is also trying to stimulate this physical culture at Erkenbrand. In it he finds an ally in 'chairman' Milan, who has been proficient in martial arts for years. In a video that Quincy posted on Facebook, you can see how he gives kickboxing lessons to a bunch of Erkenbranders.


Recognition burners also shine their light on the Swedish nationalist and alt-right celebrity The Golden One. This muscle bundle, which keeps vlogs in which he rails against feminism with his chest bare chest, keeps his followers from practicing martial arts and getting used to weapons. Last October he was erkenbrand's guest of honour at a 'pagan autumn festival' in the middle of a nature reserve. There was a ritual in which special beer was drunk around an oak tree, according to a report at the site. They walked and trained with The Golden One, practicing 'jabs, hooks, low-kicks'.

Violence


Violence is a constant theme within the Erkenbrand environment. For example, an Erkenbrander claims in a podcast (How do you start an ethnostate?) that the Netherlands is being 'ethnically destroyed' by foreigners. 'That's what's going on at the moment. We are in a war. It's just either we survive, or we just don't.'


Erkenbrand visitor Harold, a meek forty-something who serves coffee in a living room full of guitars and Buddha figurines in a village somewhere in the north of the Netherlands, also fears that things like 'the import of a non-own culture' can lead to a violence climax. "At some point there will be violence. Look, we're kind of sweet, like, we all get it together. But at some point someone will say, hey wait a minute, now it's enough.'


'I am against violence, but many people within the alt-right are like this: if I get a blow, I give two blows back', says Daan, a forty-something from the Randstad who also attended an Erkenbrand conference and is convinced that the 'deep state' (the real rulers) is pushing the world in the wrong direction. 'My gut feeling says: there are confrontations coming. White young boys are preparing for self-defense."


Harold hopes that a possible confrontation of violence - a race war, so to speak - will never happen. But for that to happen, the 'war against the white man' will first have to stop.


"It's not that the white race presents itself as a white race," Harold says. "It's more that external parties name the white race and say: you are responsible for slavery, you are responsible for the backwardness of the black population, so you have to pay collectively for that. That is racism. That you lump all white people together because some of their ancestors were involved in slavery. That is racism in its purest form.'


'Why can't white people be proud?', Daan also wonders. 'Art for example, I've been to a lot of museums, but you never see Muslims there. In their home you never see beautiful art on the wall, maybe that is not allowed by their faith. My point is: the white race gets things done.'


Race is not a 'social construction', Daan and Harold know since they were 'rescued' in the field of race. Race, Daan and Harold believe, is a biological reality. Scientific research that follows this line states that there are obvious differences between races. That is not a value judgment, according to Daan and Harold, it is only a scientific fact.


"Of all races, Negroes are the quickest to step on their toes," says Harold, who admits to still feeling uncomfortable with conversations about race. 'They are the first to resort to violence, are the most aggressive, have the shortest fuses. The Asian race, by the way, is more intelligent than the white race. On average, they also commit less violence than whites and blacks.'


In his bookcase, Harold has recently purchased works by 'race realists', such as Jared Taylor, whom Harold met in person during the second Erkenbrand conference. 'A very warm guy who doesn't hurt a fly. And then he is dismissed as a racist.'


For some, discussion about race within Erkenbrand and the alt-right can be a breaking point. As for the highly educated Daisy, who carefully chooses her words. Many themes that were discussed at an Erkenbrand meeting she attended, she found relevant in themselves. Such as talking about the demographic problem facing the Netherlands, 'you don't hear the mainstream media about that'. Because of the explosive population growth in Africa, the arrival of refugees, high birth rates among Muslims and low among original Dutch peoples, Daisy fears that the original Dutch and western freedoms will lose ground on other peoples. 'What will our country look like in 50 years? Are we heading for conflict? We already have so many collisions. I just find that terrifying.' We should be able to talk about that, daisy thinks. "But when you start talking about it, you immediately get a sermon about the persecution of the Jews, as if you were Hitler."


In racial theory, however, lies with her the limit - incidentally, she did not feel equally comfortable with anti-feminism in the alt-right scene. 'You can choose opinions, but not the body you were born into.'


She no longer attends erkenbrand meetings. Daisy now focuses on a 'more moderate' party and attended meetings of Forum for Democracy. 'The party is looking for cooperation, listens carefully to the people.' She has read Thierry Baudet's book Oikophobia and shares his analysis of the fear of one's own. 'There is so much self-criticism. If it's so ugly here, why does everyone want to come here? I understand that it is beautiful here, but that is why we can also protect it.'

Fans of Baudet


The hardcore alt-righters also focus on Thierry Baudet's FvD. Geert Wilders seems to be a passed station. The PVV politician is still appreciated for his pioneering role in the fight against 'Islamization', but he no longer appeals to the imagination. This is partly due to his sleazy rhetoric and his closed party culture. This is partly due to his 'false analysis' - he focuses on religion and not race - and the strong anti-Semitic dimension in the alt-right scene. For despite its contemporary appearance, the alt-right largely builds on old, dark brown ideas about a "global Zionist conspiracy." Wilders, who maintains strong ties with Israel, enjoys little confidence for this reason.


"There is great suspicion towards the PVV; if you see where he gets his money from, Israel, he is not transparent about that', says Daan, who also voted for FvD. "What the alt-right gets so tired of: as soon as you start talking about Israel and Zionism, you are accused of anti-Semitism. I don't hate Jews, but I do hate certain Jews."



Baudet's style of politics, combined with his intellectual pretensions, are much more popular with Erkenbrand. His posts often fit right into the gamut of the alt-right, such as last week when the politician tweeted about the murders of white farmers in South Africa.


Several Erkenbranders attend meetings of FvD, many make efforts to promote the FvD case on Twitter, Facebook, discord's chat channels, on the politically incorrect forum /pol/ of 4chan, or at the even more notorious 8chan. They call Baudet 'our leader', 'our boy' and 'cherry'. In a podcast about FvD - three months before the elections - an Erkenbrander says: 'We have to deploy a memes army. If Trump succeeds in becoming president of America from a position within a year and a half, then we should succeed in helping FvD to two seats. (...) Two seats of the FvD make a much more significant difference than 35 or 37 seats of the PVV.'


Especially in spreading such memes - fabricated images that score on social media - they excel. Like the famous photo of Baudet lying on a piano in which his face has been replaced by that of Pepe The Frog, the mascot of the alt-right. This meme was shared by Baudet on Twitter on January 6 this year with approval. "Our boy just retweets this. Cancer boss', responds an Erkenbrander enthusiastically to 4chan.


Some Erkenbranders also boast that they have a short line to 'our boy' Baudet. Erkenbrand member Sam van der Hyden (a pseudonym) shares on 4chan two photos of books signed by Baudet. Baudet is addressing a signature to '/polder/', the forum on 4chan where many Erkenbranders are present. According to this Sam van der Hyden, Baudet would have told him that he has never been on /pol/ himself, but is familiar with it. Another, anonymous Erkenbrand member tells on 4chan that he could conclude from a conversation with Baudet that FvD has alt-right sympathies and is familiar with Erkenbrand.


Fausto is also happy to emphasize the ties with Baudet on 4chan. In an attempt to impress other 4chan'ers, he says that Baudet has sometimes sent a private message to Erkenbrand on Twitter with a compliment for a certain podcast.


At the same time, they are aware that the connection with the far-right FvD can cause damage. When Constant Kusters, leader of the neo-Nazi party Nederlandse Volks-Unie (NVU), claims in the media last August that he is cooperating with the FvD, it leads to a lot of name-calling in the closed Discord chat. 'God strong Kusters, that mongol', writes Fausto, who fears that association of the NVU with FvD could be detrimental to the latter. Other Erkenbranders swear along and express the suspicion that Kusters is a mole of the AIVD, which was 'planted' to harm white nationalism.


This raises the question of whether love is mutual. On 27 May, Baudet said in the Volkskrant about the Erkenbrand students: 'Sometimes they fly out of the corner, but they are young people who are busy discovering the world.' Baudet now thinks differently, says his spokesman. "At the time, he thought it was a conservative study club, but if this club espouses racist and anti-Semitic ideas, he wants absolutely nothing to do with it." According to the spokesperson, nothing can be sought behind the assignments in the books. These are 'usually off the cuff, because enthusiastic attendees ask for it'. In Baudet's memory, the assignment with '/polder/' was 'a reference to a chat box of which the applicant told that FvD supporters were active'. He does not want to respond to the alleged private message to Erkenbrand about which Fausto wrote and the retweeting of his photo with the alt-right mascot Pepe.

Weapons


The Erkenbranders hope that FvD will promote their ideas in the Netherlands, but they are also trying to build up a broad international network. The conference in October was attended by a delegation from the London Forum (the most important alt-right movement in Britain) and from the Greek neo-Nazi party Golden Dawn (one of them, 'the Spartan', also spoke at a living room meeting of Erkenbranders in October). The study society itself recalled the conference on its website as "undeniably the largest alt-right conference in continental Europe to date." In recent months, Fausto has gathered European kindred spirits in the Discord chat under the name 'European Right'.


However, there is also open speculation about the use of means other than democratic ones to achieve the goal. 'If not ballots, then bullets', Fausto recently tweeted under his pseudonym. Shortly thereafter, he revealed that he owns a weapon himself. If someone in the Discord chat notices that he is sure Fausto has a 'gun', Fausto responds on September 15 with: 'Shhhh, But yes, number of guys in EB have licenses' (a number of guys from Erkenbrand have a gun license). After the attacks in Barcelona, a participant writes: 'Why not attacks in the Netherlands. Would be very healthy in our country.'


Personally, Fausto goes even further. "Just cycling home," he wrote on August 17 on Discord. '2 mocros on a scooter on my neck. Gay yelling at me. Teringlijers. Shouted back and knife drawn and they were gone pretty quickly. But seriously. I'm so tired of mocros.' When someone else compliments him on his reaction, Fausto continues: 'I think I would have stabbed them if they had stepped off. This is why you carry a weapon."


That same day, the left-wing activist Anne Fleur Dekker, a popular target in alt-right circles, is also scolded. 'Chaining to a radiator and getting pregnant', Fausto writes.


How the 'number two' of Erkenbrand means these statements exactly is not clear. If we present him with copies of all these statements about gun ownership, knife-pulling and threats and ask him for rebuttal, he does not respond substantively. However, he starts deleting messages like crazy. Within an hour, he cleaned up Discord's chat channel.

COLIN LIDDELL ARGUING AGAINST "WIGNAT" SOUTHERN DINGO ON THE LUKE FORD SHOW (2018)


On the 22nd of December 2018, Neokrat Editor Colin Liddell appeared on The Luke Ford Show and debated "Neo-Nazi Wignat" Southern Dingo (Louis Jeffery Giovingo). Dingo pushed the usual Wignat narrative that Whites were passive victims of "Super Jews," while Liddell attributed the demographic decline of Whites as a group to their self-chosen individual freedoms. He also pointed out that a pathetic victim mentality combined with paranoid Anti-Semitism was not a productive avenue for identitarian activism and recommended learning lessons from Europe.

This exchange occurred at the tail end of a 'famous' 7+ hour livestream. in which Matt Forney, Nick Fuentes, Baked Alaska, and the Irony Bros trolled Edgytarian boomer Jim Goad. You can see the full video here.

Exchange with Southern Dingo begins at 10:45.

Thursday, July 28, 2022

TRS INSIDER JOHNNY MONOXIDE SPILLS THE BEANS ON MIKE ENOCH AND CREW


Deep dive into TRS lore, as YouTuber Afro Sephardic Society interviews Johnny Monoxide (
John Ramondetta, above), once a central figure in the Jewish-led "Neo-Nazi" TRS group. 


OPERATION ASIAN-ARYANISM


Pilleater does a masterful piss take of the Alt-Right "bro-chadding" presentation style, but applied to his more nerdy and esoteric interests. Cue constant swearing while wearing a ski mask, and occasional references to eating raw eggs and lifting weights.

Wednesday, July 27, 2022

INCLUSIVISTY, LIKE FUNERALS, IS ALL ABOUT WHO IS NOT THERE



In one of his videos from earlier this year, Simon Webb applies his mathematical skills to the problem of the overrepresentation of Blacks on British TV and the BBC in particular.

He reports that the BBC website had an article (with a video) about young entrepreneurs. The picture, of course, featured four faces, all Black. According to Webb, this was yet another example of the BBC giving this group, which makes up only around 3% of the UK population, its full spotlight.

He then calculated the odds of four individuals from such a small minority all appearing in a photo at random to be over a million to one (33 X 33 X 33 X 33), proving conclusively that the BBC was pushing the Black kids to the front with an unholy zealotry. 

Webb furthermore pointed out that South Asians, who make up a larger percentage of the UK population, are typically underrepresented in things like this. 

Of course the paranoids in the Alt-Right (possibly under the influence of their Russian handlers seeking to polarise the West) will tell you this is all part of a plot by Klaus Schwab, George Soros, and Ghost of Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi to prepare the way for the extinction of the White race.

Naturally a sensible person like Webb has no time for such nonsense, which may be why he still has a flourishing YouTube channel. But, after pushing our "race buttons" in this quite a legitimate way, he sadly leaves the question hanging there without any explanation for why such a clearly non-random act is happening. To their credit, the conspiracy theorists in the Alt-Right at least attempt explanations, even if these are almost always pathetically mad.


In my view, this sort of thing does not need to be such a mystery. This "young entrepreneur" puff piece is clearly an attempt at what is known as "inclusion," amplified by the desire to provide "positive models" for a group that manifestly lacks them.

According to the BBC Charter, the organisation has a target of making 15% of all on-screen portrayals Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic (BAME). The breakdown of the BAME component, which is disproportionately dominated by Afro-Caribbeans, clearly needs looking at. No doubt in the future this will become a major issue. But, leaving that aside, let's look at this core BBC policy.


The BBC's Content Diversity and Inclusion Commissioning Guidelines phrase it as follows:

We are committed to meeting ambitious new portrayal targets that cover a wider range of diversity than ever before – with positive impact for audiences and greater opportunity for diverse talent. We need your help to ensure that the UK’s diverse communities and groups are authentically represented on screen and that we deliver a rich and thought-provoking mix of portrayal.

Yes, it may seem that "diversity" is just a codeword for "less White people," but what the BBC is trying to do in the case of the "young entrepreneurs" is (a) present "positive role models" and (b) avoid anything that looks like "tokenism."

Quite simply, Blacks lag behind in entrepreneurship. (Nobody, of course, knows the reason for this, although sunspots may be suspected.) But the result is the BBC thinks that it has to then "overrepresent" the "underepresented."

Of course, this could easily be done by having just one Black, among the four, as this would still be overrepresentation by a factor of eight. But the problem with that is it would look like "tokenism," a dirty word for the BBC and broadcasting regulators, like the Office of Communications (Ofcom). A recent Ofcom report "
Representation and portrayal on BBC TV 2018" notes the "horrors" of tokenism:

Audiences are wary of ‘box-ticking’ and react against it Some people we spoke to were sensitive to what they called ’box-ticking’ or ’tokenism’, where they felt people with particular characteristics had been included primarily to make a programme appear more diverse, rather than to improve quality.

“Question Time is normally a bunch of Caucasian people on there with maybe a token person on there to argue the case. The One Show the same thing; the news – it’s all the same” (Female 18-34 Black African, London)

So, yes, having just one young "Black entrepreneur" is not going to cut it. The code word, as we see in the BBC's Content Diversity and Inclusion Commissioning Guidelines is "authentic", which is the opposite of "tokenism," and presents people as they are naturally are, i.e. preferring to associate with their own kind. That means putting four Blacks where one would previously have done. If it hasn't already happened, an "authentic" all-Black episode of Question Time is clearly on the cards.

The real problem here, however, is that culture, news, and media attention is not and never has been a level playing field. People are focused on and included based on worth, talent, and newsworthiness. It is a natural, organic hierarchy and one that favours the core population that generates the culture, namely "bad old White people."

This inbuilt organic media bias also tends to favour men over women, the fit over the disabled, and people of certain optimum ages, rather than the very young and very old. Also smart and charismatic people.

In order to counter all this natural, organic bias, a major effort of social and cultural engineering is required, one that the BBC and the British establishment, in their Neoliberal egalitarian zeal, have signed up for.

Inclusion, at the end of the day, is really about who is not there and then pretending that they are. A bit like funerals.


Possibly the BBC's efforts might encourage a few young Black kids, who otherwise wouldn't have done so, to become entrepreneurs, or at least try. Or maybe they'll just see it as patronising and feel even more resentment. Really, we'll never know.

The cost, however, is for more White people to think that the system hates them and that the Alt-Right may be telling them the truth about a coordinated scheme of "racial replacement," with a rise in anti-Semitism thrown into the bargain. Multicultural societies have an inbuilt tendency, it seems, to operate as zero-sum games.

Connected content:
Racist BBC Forces Blacks into White Roles

___________________________________


Colin Liddell is the Chief Editor of Neokrat and the author of Interviews & Obituaries, a collection of encounters with the dead and the famous. Support his work by buying it here (USA), here (UK), and here (Australia). 


CHAOS AT KRONSTADT: WHEN BRITISH SPEEDBOATS CRIPPLED THE COMMUNIST FLEET


One of the reasons that the Baltic states (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania) were able to gain their independence from Russia was because of the support of the Royal Navy. Historigraph recounts one of the key events in this struggle, when the Royal Navy sent six small torpedo boats into the heavily defended Soviet naval base of Kronstadt and caused chaos.

Sunday, July 24, 2022

META-LIBERTARIANISM AND THE PARADOX OF FREEDOM

Does absolute freedom, like absolute power, corrupt absolutely?


Before we begin I would like to make it clear that I support minimal government and generally oppose tribalism. This article does not proclaim to posit a fully fleshed-out system, only to open up the discussion to it.

Libertarianism is a philosophy of government which embraces personal responsibility and minimal government. Yet many have reinterpreted it as libertine, which is essentially the absence of personal responsibility alongside the absence of governance.

Utopian ideals appear to be the norm in modern civilization. The communists believe that their system will bring about utopia, and the majority of libertarians hold true to the ideal that a lack of governing of the individual will bring about a state which is as close to perfect as possible for all concerned; in other words most libertarians believe in an achievable utopia.

There is a problem with the idea that maximizing freedom creates optimal outcomes, and this problem is social cohesion, or rather the abolition thereof. Social cohesion is necessary for a peaceful society, as well as for a system which runs smoothly, which itself is necessary for an optimized system. As libertarians we run into a problem of balancing social cohesion with personal liberty.

The basic question seems to be:

How can one initiate and maintain social cohesion without violating the personal liberties of individuals?

But, actually, this is not the correct first question to ask. Within philosophy, the topic of freedom has been addressed many times, and many philosophers have covered the reasoning I am about to cover here.

The instincts of man tend to become primary when man is allowed as much freedom as possible. This necessarily implies that the animal nature of man is raised above the higher, rational portion of man's being.

The question thus arises as to whether the animalistic human is equal with the rational man. A good measure of this is to check if both produce the same quality of product and behavior. As far as behavior is concerned, it is clear that man as run by instinct is a violent and largely unproductive creature.

In terms of quality of product this is varied. A man ruled by his instincts can produce great quality, so long as his work is that which he loves most, but otherwise he is bound to disdain his work and therefore produce with low quality.

This raises yet another question: that of the importance of quality production. Society requires products and services in order to function, and lower quality production necessarily leads to lower quality within the society itself.

A further question is that of the enslavement of one's self to one's own instincts. Can a man truly be free if he is ruled by his own animalistic tendencies?

Every philosopher I have seen address this question has come to the same conclusion: the complacent following of instinct removes the element of choice. This effectively makes one unfree and thusly the instinctual man is not part of the same class as the rational man, even in a civilization which holds no caste system within its confines.

Furthermore, science itself backs up this notion. Instincts are hardwired behavioral patterns which we are compelled to  follow by chemicals endogenously produced by the body. This means in a scientific sense that a man who follows his instincts is nothing more than a drug addict enslaved to his addiction.

This brings us back to the problem of the balance between liberty and social cohesion. If one has too much liberty, one tends towards their primal nature; but if government enforces cohesion, government tends towards authoritarianism and even totalitarianism. How then, do we, as a civilization, enforce cohesion without violating the rights of the individual? 

Within various subcultural societies in the United States there are practices of social shaming. The most readily available of these would be the Amish, who allow dissenters to leave their society if they choose, and actively encourage such. However, for those who choose to remain, social pressure is a constant and persistent aspect of life. Anyone who begins to step outside of the bounds of the Amish culture will face relentless pressure and will be much more inclined to leave the society altogether as opposed to staying and attempting to institute change. No violence is enacted upon these people, and no force is placed in their path, aside from the obstinance of the standard adherents to the culture; at most, dissidents face shunning, which itself is entirely voluntary on the part of those performing the shunning.

What does Amish society have that we have lost?

We will circle back to the Amish shortly. For now, let us analyze civilization and government.

Liberty has been a goal of the individual for many thousands of years, with a few exceptional individuals garnering spiritual titles for their grand efforts. As such, limiting government from interfering with individual rights has been primary to these people. Meanwhile, government has tended towards monarchy, and especially theocratic monarchy for a few reasons. Firstly, that monarchy provides a singular focal point for the whole of civilization to base itself around. Secondly, following the first point, a singular governing point provides a simple goal to strive towards. Thirdly, and most relevant to the modern age, a singular point of governance provides the most rapid method of change in the face of necessity.

Yet smaller, more centralized government tends to trample on the rights of the individual. As such, individualists have throughout time attempted to either limit or eliminate the authority of government, thus moving further away from monarchy. The first and foremost of these attempts was the Magna Carta, as signed by King John. Yes, it was signed under duress, which may invalidate it legally, but it has been upheld for over five hundred years and is unlikely to have its influence overturned any time soon.

Oswald Mosley, the founder of the British Fascist Party, proposed a three-tiered system of socio-governmental organisation, with the crown as a guiding central point, parliament as the legislative body, and the syndicates (comprised of the working class).

His system certainly does not lack balance, only nuance. When the largest governing body, in this case the syndicates, is given equal power to the legislative branch, issues arise. Firstly, because the working class is not the most educated part of society it is unlikely to propose optimal solutions to problems. Secondly, a large body of people without dictatorial governance has a tendency to squabble amongst itself for prolonged periods of time.

The Marxist viewpoint may become useful here, as it provides a perspective of domination versus subjugation, which may aid in establishing a balance between the people, the collectives, and the government. If the bourgeoisie and proletariat are equal in size or in power, then a stalemate is reached, meaning equilibrium has been attained between the government and the people. The American system of government provides us with four branches of government; judicial, legislative, executive, and publus (body of the people). The people offset the executive branch and are balanced by the judicial and legislative branches which offset each other, thusly creating a criss-cross of power balance.

Of course this only works if the publus recognizes itself as a branch of government and takes action as such.

J6: The Publus in action?

Americans seem to have forgotten the fourth and largest branch of government. Yet in returning to the Amish, everyone can recognize the publus that is comprised of Amish society at large. Each individual choosing to participate in society, and each doing their part to hold each other accountable.

Under a meta-libertarian system the government must work to maintain the publus in order to prevent its loss of consciousness. It 
must also incorporate social cohesion as a goal, and must recognize the publus as the largest and most powerful branch of government.

In short a balance must be established between government and publus, and 
all the while individual rights must be recognized as the highest. Standards must be maintained, norms and customs. Perhaps this is only truly possible with the establishment of a new ethnos.

I know not what such a system would look like, but I expect this to be a good outline.

HARRY TRUMAN AND LBJ ACCIDENTALLY CREATED "THE SOUTHERN STRATEGY"

by Brett Stevens

We hear frequently from Democrats about “the Southern Strategy” that Republicans are using capture the vote of primitive, clinging-to-guns-and-religion, racist Southerners. The real history proves a bit more complicated, because the Southern Strategy was an attempt to capture White voters fleeing the Civil Rights agenda:

Up until the post-World War II period, the party’s hold on the region was so entrenched that Southern politicians usually couldn’t get elected unless they were Democrats. But when President Harry S. Truman, a Democratic Southerner, introduced a pro-civil rights platform at the party’s 1948 convention, a faction walked out.

After that, the majority of the South still continued to vote Democratic because it thought of the Republican party as the party of Abraham Lincoln and Reconstruction. The big break didn’t come until President Johnson, another Southern Democrat, signed the Civil Rights Act in 1964 and the Voting Rights Act in 1965.

During the late 1960s and early ‘70s, white Southerners were still transitioning away from the Democratic party (newly enfranchised black Southerners voted and continue to vote Democratic). And even as Republican Richard Nixon employed a “Southern strategy” that appealed to the racism of Southern white voters, former Alabama Governor George Wallace (who’d wanted “segregation now, segregation tomorrow, and segregation forever”) ran as a Democrat in the 1972 presidential primaries.

In other words, the “Southern Strategy” existed for one election to take advantage of events already set in motion by the Leftist takeover of the Democrats via Civil Rights as a means of appealing to minority voters.

Also published at Amerika.org

Thursday, July 21, 2022

CONSERVATIVE PARTY ON COURSE FOR ELECTORAL WIPEOUT FOLLOWING POINTLESS CHANGE OF LEADERS

Doomed!

Tory MPs must really hate their jobs, as the two final contenders for the Conservative Party leadership are both on course for electoral wipeout at the next General Election, something that will see most of the 357 Tory MPs losing their jobs. The next election is due to be held by 2024. 

The final two candidates, selected by fellow Conservative MPs in a round of ballots, are former chancellor Rishi Sunak and Foreign Secretary Liz Truss. Neither are very popular or likeable and will now face an election involving all 150,000 or so Conservative Party members.

However, according to a July 19th poll at FindoutNowUK, it doesn't matter which one wins the leadership contest, as the Tories are set to be crushed under either leader, with both polling at a measly 25%. This is 20 points lower than the score achieved by former leader Boris Johnson in the 2019 election. 


The leadership contest was forced on the party after Johnson stepped down following a trivial incident in which a Conservative MP apparently touched another man's bottom under the influence of alcohol during LGBTQ+ Pride month. 

ABE WAS EFFECTIVELY KILLED BY COVID LOCKDOWN (AND "TARGET DENIAL")

The assassin's preferred target could not visit Japan due to Covid restrictions

It appears that the decisive factor in the recent assassination of Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe was the Covid lockdown, which has been particularly severe in Japan, at least with regard to external visitors.

Tetsuya Yamagami (41), the man accused of shooting Abe, has confessed that he originally intended to kill Hak Ja Han Moon, the female co-founder of the Unification Church, better known as the Moonies, but switched targets after Moon’s visits to Japan were curtailed by the coronavirus pandemic. Yamagami was incensed against the Church after his mother was persuaded to donate the family fortune, around 100 million yen (€715,000), to the Church, after she joined following the death of her husband from suicide. 

The impoverishment of the family lead Yamagami, who was reportedly very smart, to blame the Church for his inability to go to university and his diminished prospects in life, which saw him working in a number of lower-paid jobs. The Unification Church, meanwhile, has been pushing back on Yamagami's claims.

As reported by The Irish Times:

The church has tried to distance itself from claims that it bankrupted the Yamagami family. Tomihiro Tanaka, the head of its Japanese branch, confirmed that Mrs Yamagami was a member, but denied extorting money from her. The Moonies have since insisted they returned much of the cash. A group of lawyers fighting the church for the return of hundreds of millions of dollars in donations says both of those claims are false.

Either way, a picture emerges of a man who grew angry at his reduced station in life. Relatives have recalled phone calls from a young Tetsuya Yamagami and his two hungry siblings, demanding food. Instead of going to university, he joined the Maritime Self-Defence Force (Japan’s navy) in 2002, the year his mother declared bankruptcy. Thereafter, he slid down the social ladder and was unemployed and living in a one-room flat when he was arrested for Abe’s murder. Friends recall him being depressed and crying bitterly at his brother’s funeral.

Unable to exact revenge on whom he really blamed, due to travel restrictions into Japan, Yamagami was forced to transfer his animosity to Abe, who had minor links with the religious group. Last year Abe, along with Donald Turmp, gave back-to-back recorded speeches to a meeting of the Universal Peace Federation, an affiliate of the Church, praising the group’s work promoting peace and "family values."

That last term, in particular, must have rankled with Yamagami.

Monday, July 18, 2022

DOES ALT-RIGHT CONSPIRITARDISM HAVE A FUTURE?


There will always be stupid people who understand almost nothing of how the World works but yet want to "explain" it. There will always be emotionally incontinent and hysterical people viscerally attracted to outlandish and frankly childish conspiracy theories. So, the answer to the question in the title of this article might seem to be a resounding "yes."

But actually conspiritardery does not depend purely on such types, and like any phenomenon, it has its seasons, its winters and springs, its high tides and its ebbs.

For conspiritardery to flourish it needs not just the conspiritardial to be on board, it also requires heftier intellects backing it up, and other factors boosting it.

It is my contention here that conspiritardery passed through something of a Golden Age in the last 20 or so years, and that that season is now coming to a close. In short, conspiritardery will have a much more difficult time going forward. In fact it could go the way of the hula hoop, space hoppers, and other past fads.

If we look at an Ngram graph, which details the frequency of the use of the term in books, we see that the actual term "conspiracy theory," a relatively good indicator of the prevalence of the phenomenon itself, had its first upward blip in the period leading up to WWII. It then quickly subsided, as the earnestness of the war and the post-war period took over. It then started to rise again in the 1950s, possibly fuelled by Cold War "paranoia." It then kept on rising through the Culture Wars and Generational Splits of the 1960s, but then dropped from 1972 to 1987, after which it shot rapidly upwards to higher levels than ever.

In recent years, the term seems to be rising exponentially as if the phenomenon is about to become totally dominant. But, really, this looks like any other unstable spike, likely to turn into a two-sided peak with a collapsing down-slope once the smart money pulls out, leaving the idiots carrying the can as usual.

This seems likely to happen with conspiracy theories because the fundamental prediction made by conspiritardery is wrong.

Now, this might seem to be something of a sweeping statement, but not if we approach things from a macro-empirical perspective. In fact, that is the only approach that makes sense. Of course, it is relatively easy to take a micro-empirical approach and find plenty of small predictions or descriptions made by various important and unimportant conspiritards that turned out to be fake, stupid, or just insane, but the conspiritardially inclined are always ready to ignore any number of specific debunkings, and to hide in the chaotic jungle that the world appears to be to so many of them. 

Looked at macro-empirically, however, the one big thing that all conspiracy theorists effectively say is that the World is controlled. It is not even important to go into the detail of who is supposedly controlling it. Take your pick! But the idea of a controlled world is the unifying factor. 


This may not be apparent to the superficial analyst, as many conspiracy theorists cite any crisis or chaotic event as yet further proof of X-group exerting their evil control over the World. Remember Covid was all cooked up to further the control of the globalists and the WEF, yadda yadda yadda...

But even here the formula is {chaos = control by X-group} often with a side order of "just maybe we can use the chaos THEY THEMSELVES have unleashed on us to turn the tables on THEM."

My good friend Richard Wolstencroft is quite skilful at dishing up these kinds of faintly hopeful narratives of slavery with a hint of rebellion. While another friend, Andy Nowicki, is content to escape from the "controlled world of the globalist pedos" through some sort of inner spiritual act of resistance that must seem nice but pretty meaningless to anyone not in his immediate head space.

The link of these two estimable and intelligent individuals to what was once called the Alt-Right is noteworthy, as the Alt-Right in its more intellectually potent early phase (circa 2010-2015) was something that was both a reaction to a World that seemed overly controlled and a philosophical bulwark to conspiritardial interpretations of reality.

In short, the World that gestated the Alt-Right was very different from the World we exist in today.

How could you forget?

While the late decadent phase of the contemporary Alt-Right/ Dissident Right (as showcased on various YouTube channels, like that run by another one of my pals Iron Duke) is an attempt to grasp "order" out of the apparent chaos of everyday life with its drag queen story hours and woke TV commercials, the early virile phase of the Alt-Right was an attempt to create chaos out of what was seen as a stultifyingly ordered world.

The early Alt-Right was the bastard child of Francis Fukuyama's "End of History" and its focus on an endless and timeless world of bland Rotary Club values, managerial competence, and stale consumerism, all things that most piqued the Alt-Right's principal founder Richard Spencer, an ex-friend of mine, but someone with whom I still have quite a few things in common.

The World of the Nineteen-Nineties and the Twenty Zeroes, aside from the occasional glitch like a couple of planes crashing into the World Trade Centre live on TV, was a depressingly controlled world, where the Globe did seem to be controlled by a secretive or even cabalistic elite that was well beyond the reach of the average man in the street.

This was ideal soil for creating the intellectual tools of elite critique and a rejection of unipolarity that later degenerated into the conspiritardery we see today. Putin was still a dwarf and China, we were confidently told, was caught in our irresistible "Chimerica" tractor beam. Even the Left caught a flavour of this world and were triggered into their "Occupy Wall Street" movement in 2011, soon after the Alt-Right was launched.

Yes, the strongest underpinnings of a conspiritardial outlook grew out of a hatred and rejection of the order that existed. This was later boosted by external state actors, like Russia and China, as they increasingly took the trouble to prove that Fukuyama was simply wrong by hacking into the Hegemon's social media systems.

The original Alt-Right critique was that everything was run by a relatively centralised global elite, and this made sense, circa the 2002 Gulf War. But now we life in a world where, unless you want to engage in convoluted Ptolemaic thinking, clearly no single group is in charge.

The effort required to hold convoluted
 ideas severely reduces effective IQ
The Chinese are on the side of the Russians at present against the Americans, although who knows when they'll seize their chance to take Siberia, while the Europeans still need the Americans, while resenting them and possibly playing a double game with regard to Russia and China -- just to name a few of the big fault lines. And that's without going into all the various internal clique, class, race, and other differences that seem to be rife everywhere. 

In short, in recent years, the world has returned to its semi-chaotic true nature, while the 20 years or so following the collapse of the Soviet Union was a transient and illusory phase of what seemed like a sinister World Order. It was this mirage that called into being the conspiritardial elements that now repeatedly fail to describe reality and routinely distort history in the process; elements whose only function seems to be to serve as evaporating pans for impotent and pointless emotion.

Much as it may shock the naïve and the historically unlettered, chaos is not the friend of conspiritardery. Order is. And, as it ebbs, so do does conspiritardery as a meaningful force.

___________________________________


Colin Liddell is the Chief Editor of Neokrat and the author of Interviews & Obituaries, a collection of encounters with the dead and the famous. Support his work by buying it here (USA), here (UK), and here (Australia).