White nationalism has a problem. It has found itself in the unenviable position of being more or less the face of the MAGA coalition, whilst dictating none of the policy. When opponents of MAGA rail against it, they rail against the "evil Nazi" Stephen Miller deporting poor browns in their millions, while MAGA’s focus on spectacle over effectiveness has deported fewer brown people than Biden or Obama.
Of course, this is far from the only reason why it’s generally a bad thing to be the face of, or indeed anywhere near, the MAGA coalition. After all, it stands for paedophilia, fraud, and crime in general. It seeks to align itself with the authoritarian non-white shitholes of the world rather than “librul” Europe. Its core policy planks include legalising corruption, putting sawdust in bread, eliminating all consumer protections, and destroying such "woke liberal sacred cows" as weather prediction, accountability in government, counterintelligence and cybersecurity against hostile foreign states, and, oh yes, national parks. To top it all off, it reeks of curry and rancid tacos because, and let’s face facts here, MAGA is a movement composed primarily of browner Hispanics and Subcontinentals who resent their white liberal betters.
Now, white nationalists were fine with most of the above. After all, what’s a few core achievements of Western Civilisation compared to the chance to trigger a libtard or two? It is a well known "fact" that the more triggered libtards are, the more "winning" is done politically.
But something happened recently which made even this hardscrabble tribe reconsider their association with MAGA, namely the partial release of the Epstein files. Not that Trump’s paedophilic tendencies and associations weren’t visible before. Rather, at this point, they became undeniable to all but the dullest, most deluded, most dishonest of cads, dopes, and true believers. It appears that being a willing participant and likely founder of a scheme to secure CSAM kompromat on and launder money for the world’s elite is a bridge too far even for those most devoted of "battered wives," namely white nationalists.
Compounding the issue, and preventing an all-too convenient retreat into despondence and nihilism is the fact that the UK and Norway have arrested Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor (formerly prince Andrew) and former prime minister Thorbjørn Jagland, respectively, for their association with Epstein. Had those two countries not taken measures to prosecute Epstein associates, it would have been possible for white nationalists, as well as the entire MAGA ecosystem to proclaim, in good Russian style, that all is meaningless, all elites are corrupt, nobody will be prosecuted and thereby, if you’ll permit me an algebraic metaphor, multiply both sides by Epstein and carry on as usual. As things stand, we observe a marked difference between the “cringe and librul” government of Sir Keir Starmer, which prosecutes a prince at the pleasure of the King, and the “based and red-pilled” government of Donald Trump which protects paedophiles because the DOW index is over 50. 000.
White nationalist response to the files has come in two flavours. The first kind is more amusing to observe. Having failed to disassociate Trump from Epstein and having further failed to dilute the issue with “both sides” and whataboutism style rhetoric, they’re now out in force on social media claiming that Epstein dindu nuffin, that the trafficked children were gold-digging whores exploiting this poor, innocent Jewish money launderer, fixer, spy-for-hire, and human trafficker.
The second response has been to back slowly into the shrubbery, Homer Simpson style, and re-emerge claiming that they’ve always opposed Epstein’s best friend.
Whilst I initially believed those manifesting this second response had at least the decency to be ashamed, I’ve now come to believe that they act on a conviction that we’re nothing but stupid goldfish who’ve forgotten all that they’ve said in the past 3 years or have not stored all relevant screenshots.
Regardless of the response, white nationalists are fucked. Only one of two possible paths await them in the future. Either MAGA succeeds in hollowing out the West, destroying our civilisation and dooming white people to either death or degeneration into morlocks, or MAGA is defeated and the liberal backlash introduces the entire right-wing populist coalition to the business end of nice white liberals in the full throes of a moralistic berserker rage.
So, why should I care. What difference does it make to me if Nick Fuentes is roasted on a spit (and not in the way he wants, either), served with an apple in his mouth and devoured by ravenous Minnesotan pensioners? I certainly won’t shed tears for the white nationalists who nailed their colours to the good ship Criminal Noncery. My concern is with those elements of the ideology which are necessary for the survival of white people.
As it stands, the absolute moral depravity of white nationalists doesn’t automatically mean that white nationalism is an ideology completely devoid of value. We do, in fact, need an ideological framework which asserts the right of white people to survive, to remain the majority within their ancestral homelands, and which exhorts white countries to reject inter-white warfare and other forms of conflict in favour of struggle against the common, non-white enemy. Never in the history of human ideas has an idea as worthy and necessary as white racial identitarianism been advanced by people as spineless, odious, and morally bankrupt as we see today.
In the realm of ideas, ideas should stand on their own merits. But in the realm of pale shadows on a cave’s wall that we occupy, ideas are coloured by the men who bear them and even by the those standing next to them. Right now these vital and necessary ideas are tainted by their association, not only with the odious dissident right, but also by their association with the criminal paedophile network known as MAGA.
While I welcome the imminent tribunals which will put an end to the out-of-control rightoid infestation, I fear for the future of Western civilisation and white people. The ideas and policies we need to survive might also find themselves on the chopping block. At the very least, we will not be able to advance them publicly for at least the next 20 years.
Well, 20 years is my cautiously optimistic prediction. Other thinkers are saying more in the ballpark of 40-50 years. In any case, some time will have to pass before the majority of white people get the (very justified) moral outrage at MAGA’s criminality, paedophilia, and contempt for the rule of law out of their system.
In the meantime, anything that even smells of MAGA will be dispatched to the guillotine, metaphorically or otherwise. Brown contempt for liberal and Western norms notwithstanding, MAGA’s theatrics in Minneapolis have bought them 20-50 years of leeway before the inherent contradiction between the brown brain and the White liberal mindset become apparent. The irony of ironies here is that MAGA’s foot soldiers, ICE, are a majority brown organisation, fuelled primarily by anti-white hatred of white liberals and especially white liberal women. But, by agreeing to be MAGA’s face, organised white nationalism has effectively whitewashed the brown ICE crime spree in Minneapolis and elsewhere.
ICE: Why the masks?
So, what do we, who care about the ideas and the survival of our people, do now? The short answer is: lay low, wait, live to fight another day, and plant the worm of doubt in white liberals’ heads. Let’s flesh that out in more detail.
The first order of business is to survive. In scenario (1), we all die or become morlocks, so if that transpires, we are powerless to stop it. Therefore, we won’t consider it here. In scenario (2), we need to avoid the consequences of the liberal berserker rage. To do that, we must get completely out of the way, disassociate ourselves from MAGA completely and also proactively take part in its downfall.
If you’re called upon to participate in the stoning of MAGAs, you must throw the stones as enthusiastically and as vigorously as any outraged liberal. Rejecting MAGA, however, will not be enough. Like I said, we’re now in the unenviable position of having our ideology serve as a mascot for a movement that’s about to be wiped off the face of the planet.
It won’t be enough to merely survive. We will have to survive as white nationalists in order to advance our ideas when the time comes. That means that if quizzed, you must not volunteer information about your ideology. But on the other hand, you likewise shouldn’t lie or pretend to be an "antiracist."
What we say informs what we believe in our hearts, and no man can wear two faces for long without wondering which of the two is the real one. You must learn to defend your ideology from a liberal and leftist standpoint. It probably won’t work, but that’s the tight-rope we must walk now. Don’t cuck, don’t be caught.
If you’re pressed on it, use nothing but the facts in your defence. Point out the non-white nature of MAGA. Point to Stephen Miller, the Jewish Gauleiter commanding MAGA’s brown Cheka against nice, white liberals. Point to all the non-white illiberal shitholes that MAGA has aligned itself with, such "bastions of civilisation and democracy" as Qatar, Saudi Arabia, China, Russia, Israel, and El Salvador.
Argue that ideas are embedded and liberalism cannot exist outside a certain bio-civilisational modus vivendi which only European peoples have demonstrated. It’s a hard sell, best done in private, after you’ve plied your liberal friends with booze, but it’s your only shot.
Once the bloodlust has subsided, we’ll have to start releasing our ideas into the discourse space once again. Hopefully, we’d have prepared the ground in the meantime by placing the worm of doubt in people’s heads in one-on-one conversations. Eventually, even the most hardcore liberal will have to be made to understand that Western civilisation and its liberal ideology can only survive in a majority white environment.
One silver lining is that during our 20-50 years of laying low, the Curse of Eddie will keep eroding away non-white populations. Non-white reproduction simply cannot survive in an environment of universally available contraception, female choice, mandatory child support, and prohibition on rape, including marital rape.
In the absence of wilful reproduction (as opposed to instinctual rutting with reproduction as a by-product) and love-based male-female relations (as opposed to the force-based male-female relations preferred by third world cultures), these unfortunate cosmic errors will greatly decrease in number, that is, of course, unless MAGA and its national populist allies succeed in implementing the Incel agenda under the auspices of natalism. As the prime candidate for Trump’s successor is the incel-coded and miscegenating J. D. Vance, this is a serious risk.
But for at least the next 20 years, the watchword is: stay alive. Bide your time. Find your friends and speak to them so as to remain true. Stand as far away from the national populist types as possible. Dump the rightoid baggage - it’s counterproductive to white survival anyway. If you have a community, hide it behind a series of combined intelligence and personality tests which will exclude 90% of non-whites (and roughly 30% of whites).
If a non-white somehow passes muster, let him in, but bide your time and wait for his true nature to reveal itself. The main thing is to have plausible deniability and exclude non-whites for non-racial reasons. Women’s rights and prohibitions on creeping work great here.
In time, white people will once again be prepared to hear our message. In time, they’ll listen to us. But for now, due to catastrophic, unforced errors on the part of white nationalist leaderships, we have to go to ground. It’s a big, long, dark tunnel that we have to go through. Stay alive, stay true, and I’ll see you at the other end.
